The benefits of enforcing immigration laws

Posted in Illegal Aliens & Immigration Reforms on September 29th, 2007 by MorningStar

Mark Krikorian wrote in the Los Angeles Times that while it is still too soon to see the statistical evidence of immigration enforcement the consequences of blowing the senate amnesty bill out of the water and insisting on stronger government enforcement of our immigration laws appears to be improved conditions for American workers and communities.
 
The first consequence of stepped-up enforcement is attrition of the illegal population — a steady decrease in the total number of illegal aliens as more people give up and go home. Attrition is the real alternative to amnesty, and we’re seeing it work.

The Arizona Republic ran a story last month explaining how migrants were leaving the state in anticipation of tough new immigration rules. Public radio station WBUR in Boston reported that ‘in the midst of the debate about immigrants coming to America, something unusual is happening in Massachusetts: Brazilian immigrants are quietly packing up and leaving.’ And the Chicago Tribune, reporting on the Pennsylvania town at the forefront of the resistance to illegal immigration, has written that ‘over the summer, when Hazleton officials created the nation’s first ordinance aimed at driving away undocumented residents, thousands of people apparently packed up and left.’

Far from having ‘unhappy consequences,’ these developments are improving the economic bargaining power of less-skilled American workers. The Rocky Mountain News reported that in Greeley, Colo., ‘the line of applicants hoping to fill jobs vacated by undocumented workers taken away by immigration agents at the Swift & Co. meat-processing plant . . . was out the door.’ New England Cable News reported that only after a raid on a plant making leather goods for the military in New Bedford, Mass., were Americans and legal immigrants able to get hired. As one new employee said of the raid: ‘In a way, you know, it’s sad, and then in a way it’s good because at least it gives people that were not employed for so many years . . . a break to be able to work and support their families.’

When illegal aliens were removed from a Crider Poultry plant in Stillmore, Ga., the Atlanta Journal Constitution and the Wall Street Journal documented the benefits to local workers. The plant raised wages significantly, began offering free shuttles from nearby towns and provided free rooms in a company-owned dormitory. For the first time, Crider sought applicants from the state unemployment office and began hiring probationers and men from a local homeless mission. And, as the Journal noted, ‘for the first time since significant numbers of Latinos began arriving in Stillmore in the late 1990s, the plant’s processing lines were made up predominantly of African Americans.’

Better enforcement doesn’t result only in economic improvements. While there is an ongoing scholarly debate about the overall crime rates of immigrants versus the native-born, there’s no doubt that tougher enforcement has had a notable effect on gang activity. In an upcoming study, my Center for Immigration Studies reports that using immigration law against gangs has helped bring about a 39% drop in gang activity in the Washington suburb of Fairfax County, and Dallas police report a 20% drop in the murder rate as a result of the same initiative.

Of course, the consequence of uncontrolled immigration that most ordinary Americans see is what political scientist Peter Skerry calls ‘social disorder.’ Hazleton offers a good example: While cleaning graffiti from her building, a local locksmith told the Tribune that ‘about the same time the ordinance passed, the whole tone of the street changed. Virtually overnight, it was a totally different place.’

The fact that none of this is surprising to anyone except the Democratic Party should not go unnoticed.  Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi both have sworn to the Hispanic lobbyists that they will get some sort of an amnesty bill signed into law before the end of the 110th session of the U.S. Congress regardless of what the American people want.  The entire Democratic Party seems to be under the impression that some sort of amnesty bill must be enacted in order for them to ensure a Democratic victory in the 2008 presidential election and the Democrats are willing to do anything, legal or otherwise, to make that happen.

 

Technorati Tags

,  illegal aliens,  Democratic Party,

 

digg this | del.icio.us

Pelosi don’t need no stinking fence

Posted in Illegal Aliens & Immigration Reforms, Politics & Government on September 29th, 2007 by MorningStar

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called a plan to build fencing along parts of the U.S./Mexico border a “terrible idea,” and told the attendees at the Hispanic Engineering, Science & Technology Week conference at a Texas University, “I have been against the fence, I thought it’s a bad idea even when it was just a matter of discussion.”

Like the vast majority of her liberal comrades, Nancy Pelosi sees a benefit coming from more than 20 million illegal aliens entering this country.  Regardless of how many American children are run down by illegal alien hit and run drivers without auto insurance or the growing number of children victimized by illegal alien child abusers, the liberals continue to pander to illegal aliens because they represent the future of the Democratic Party, and when you get right down to it, the elitist politicians like Pelosi don’t live in areas frequented by illegal aliens and they have little to be concerned about.  If the children of the American middle class need to be put in danger so the Democrats can remain in office then that is the price they are willing to see us pay – so long as it doesn’t affect them.

This is the same rationale behind the Democratic Party’s support for the Dream Act that would provide higher education benefits to illegal aliens at the tax payer’s expense.  The average American middle class worker would have trouble paying for his or her children to go to a four year university when tuitions are pushing $20 to 40 thousand dollars per year.  Nancy Pelosi wouldn’t have any problem paying twice that to educate her kids or her grandkids and she sees no possible reason why the middle class worker would resist paying slightly higher taxes so that the illegal aliens can go to college on our dime.  After all, any kid that gets four years of free college because of the benevolent Democrats is bound to be appreciative of their efforts and vote accordingly, and if it means higher taxes for us then it is a price they are willing to see us pay.

When you get right down to it, it’s not their money, it’s a lot easier to spend somebody else’s hard earned cash than your own, and they aren’t too concerned with the tax burden the rest of us have to bear.  On Saturday the President had to sign a stop-gap measure to prevent the government from shutting down while the Democrats continue to add tax increases to the yearly spending bill.  The Democrats have already added $23 billion for domestic programs to the spending bill and at this point there is no end in sight.  At this rate the American people are soon going to have to start emulating the illegal aliens and begin taking extra jobs that will pay under the table just to make ends meet.  For that matter, I’m surprised that more people haven’t started doing this already, after all, it certainly works well for the illegal aliens and we already know that the odds of getting caught are fairly low.  

 

Technorati Tags

,  illegal aliens,  DREAM Act,  Democratic Party

 

  digg this | del.icio.us

McDonald’s – Super-Sizing Their Public Image

Posted in Illegal Aliens & Immigration Reforms, News Events & Media Censorship on September 28th, 2007 by MorningStar

Foxnews reports that 11 McDonald’s restaurants in northern Nevada have been raided by Agents for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement who arrested at least 56 illegal aliens at the fast-food franchise restaurants in Reno, Sparks and Fernley, Nevada.  The raids are the culmination of a five month investigation by ICE that was set into motion by an identity theft complaint passed on to the agency by a local law enforcement agency.  Lisa Howard, a spokeswoman for McDonald’s Corp., based in Oak Brook, Ill., said the company had no comment on the arrests.     

In another McDonald’s related story – Jury selection began in Kentucky’s Bullitt County Circuit Court in the $200 million dollar lawsuit filed by Louise Ogborn, a former McDonald’s restaurant employee in Mount Washington who was detained against her will by the restaurant manager, subjected to a strip search and subsequently sexually abused by the manager’s boyfriend in the back office of the restaurant.  Louise Ogborn was 18 years old at the time of the incident in 2004.

It seems a bit incongruous that a business that is so overly willing to cooperate with anything that smacks of authority that they would subject an employee to an incredibly humiliating strip search on the word of an unverified caller would be so lackadasical about verifying the immigration status of the people they hire.  Maybe the grease in those fries has damaged their brains.  

 

Technorati Tags

 illegal aliens, , , ,

 

  digg this | del.icio.us

Democrats back off of Dream Act amnesty for now

Posted in Illegal Aliens & Immigration Reforms on September 27th, 2007 by MorningStar

Senate Democrats yesterday retreated from forcing a debate about giving illegal-alien students a path to citizenship in the middle of the defense bill, although Majority Leader Harry Reid promised to find time before the end of the year for a vote on the proposal.

The proposal faced strong opposition from Republicans who objected to mixing immigration with the defense bill and who vowed to filibuster to defeat the measure if Democrats insisted on bringing it up now.

Sen. John Cornyn, Texas Republican, told The Washington Times last week that enough Republicans were opposed to mixing the two debates that they could block the amendment. Late yesterday, Republicans moved to cut off debate on the defense bill, leaving Democrats with no options for inserting their Dream Act proposal.

 

Technorati Tags

,  amnesty,  DREAM Act,  John Cornyn,

 

  digg this | del.icio.us

Al Sharpton & Jesse Jackson – Advocating Racism For Fun & Profit

Posted in America In Decline on September 22nd, 2007 by MorningStar

Under what circumstances would beating a high school student until he was unconscious and then repeatedly kicking him while he lay defenseless on the ground be considered perfectly acceptable and legal behavior?  As ridiculous as that question might sound, that appears to be the number one question of the hour in Jena, Louisiana where Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson have managed to turn a relatively straightforward case of attempted murder into a three ring event in the Cirque de Politiquement Correct.

On December 4, 2006, 17-year-old Jena High School student Justin Barker was savagely attacked without provocation by a group of six or more thugs that came up behind him, struck him on the back of the head, and knocked him to the ground where he lay unconscious.  Witnesses report that the attackers then crowded around him as he lay on the ground and repeatedly kicked his unconscious body. Justin Barker was subsequently scooped up off the ground and delivered to a hospital where he was treated for a concussion and assorted head injuries suffered as a direct result of being kicked repeatedly before being released.  The entire incident should have quietly slipped past everyone’s attention, the bad guys were caught and thrown in jail and the victim, while somewhat traumatized by the event, recovered from his injuries and returned to school.  Unfortunately, that was not the case because Justin Barker is a white boy and the six thugs that beat him to the ground and then tried to kick a field goal with his head, are black, and to make matters even worse, the two biggest race baiters on the entire planet have halleluiahed themselves into the thick of it with the same sort of irresponsible and inflammatory rhetoric that has made them famous and won them the admiration of ignorant liberals and similar opponents of personal responsibility across the nation. 

It’s fairly safe to assume that if we were talking about one black kid getting beat up by six white kids under similar circumstances we would be hearing about another “Hate Crime” perpetrated against everybody’s favorite oppressed minority group, but since it is the other way around it is the courts themselves (and possibly the police) who are committing the “Hate Crime.”  With Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton in Jena to see that justice is done, we shouldn’t be surprised to see the victim end up getting convicted and doing time in prison for attacking the shoes of six innocent bystanders with his head. 

Jesse and Al are both leaping for joy at this opportunity to demonstrate to all of us less sophisticated folks that racism is alive and well in rural America, and I have to admit, it certainly looks like they are telling the truth in this case because “Racist” is the only term in the English language that adequately describes their over-emotional diatribes and their attempts to instigate riotous behavior as a means to pressure the authorities into releasing the six felons who are so obviously guilty of the savage attack.  Jesse and Al are this country’s foremost advocates for blind ignorant racism.  Take a hard look at what they do; listen to the words they speak – then close your eyes for a second and imagine them as being two white guys advocating the release of six white men accused of beating a black student in the same way.  If changing the color of everybody’s skin alters your perception of what is going on in Jena, Louisiana then you have wasted your time reading this.  Despite what Jesse and Al might say on the subject, racism is not a social disorder that affects white people exclusively, they have both dedicated their lives to proving the credibility of this irrefutable fact – while telling all of us the exact opposite.

 

Technorati Tags

, ,

 

  digg this | del.icio.us

Richard Durbin finds his calling in life

Posted in Illegal Aliens & Immigration Reforms on September 22nd, 2007 by MorningStar

Illinois Democratic senator, Richard Durbin is so desperate to sell the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act to the senate Republicans that he is now claiming that this particular rendition of amnesty legislation would provide the Pentagon with a renewable source of human fodder for whatever military adventure they happen to be pursuing in the future.  Pimping human flesh and being a U.S. Senator must have a lot in common because Durbin slides into the role seemlessly like an old experianced hand.  “All recruits would be well-qualified high school graduates with good moral character,” Durbin offered with a whining drone that you could easily imagine saying “She my sister GI, numbah one virgin, very pretty.” 

The entire Democratic Party is out doing everything imaginable to seriously scuttle any hope of American victory in Iraq and this numbnut is up in the bleachers with a pair of pompoms cheering about what a good opportunity this is for the military to score a heapload of fresh warm bodies.  What a sales pitch.  Seems like the Democrats are getting more and more desperate with every passing day.  The 110th session of the U.S. Congress is going to go down in history as the least effective in congressional history if they don’t get on the ball and pass something that actually makes it into law, but this is no way to go about doing things.  The American public has had it up to the eyeballs with amnesty for illegal aliens, and the simple fact of the matter is we don’t want to hear it.  If you push it we will get rid of you and if what you were pushing, by some miricle passes, we will get rid of everyone that voted for it.  Amnesty is not flying these days and if the Democrats need to get something done they had better find another issue to deal with.

 

Technorati Tags

 illegal aliens,  amnesty,  DREAM Act,  Richard Durbin,  Democratic Party

 

  digg this | del.icio.us

Is Your Local Law Enforcement Agency A Part Of The Immigration Enforcement Problem?

Posted in Illegal Aliens & Immigration Reforms on September 19th, 2007 by MorningStar

Before your state or local police agencies can begin to check the immigration status of the people they arrest or perform any immigration related law enforcement functions they need to apply to the Department of Homeland Security for a 287(g) Agreement and send the participating officers for five or six weeks of training. The Department of Homeland Security has appealed to state, county and local police agencies across the nation trying to get them on board with this immigration enforcement effort.   At this point there are only nine sheriff’s departments and county police agencies operating county jail systems and five state law enforcement agencies and state correctional agencies that have entered into these agreements with DHS.   There are another 14 city, county or state law enforcement agencies currently considering 287(g) Authority or in the process of meeting the requirements for 287(g) Authority permitting designated officers within that group to perform immigration law enforcement functions.  If the 14 pending agreements are eventually certified there will be a total of 28 such agreements nationwide.  If that doesn’t seem like a lot to you, it’s probably because it isn’t.  If you compare the number of state, country and local law enforcement agencies with 287(g) agreements to the 120 cities and 23 entire states (plus Washington D.C.) that have officially adopted sanctuary policies with regard to illegal aliens, the size of the problem becomes a bit more clear.

Without the cooperation of local law enforcement agencies the federal immigration enforcement agencies can do very little about the problem and it will continue to grow out of control.  If you are concerned about this problem and you don’t see your state, country or city law enforcement agencies listed below you might want to ask your local representatives why they are not trying to help solve the problem of illegal aliens.

As of September 2007, the following state, county and city agencies, departments and jails have or are pursuing 287(g) agreements with the Department of Homeland Security.

  
Sheriff’s Departments and Jails
Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department (CA)
Orange County Sheriff’s Department (CA) 
Almance County (NC)
Mecklenburg County Sheriff (Charlotte, NC) 
Gaston County Sheriff (NC)
Davidson County Sheriff (Nashville TN) 
Costa Mesa Police Department (CA) (requested authority and was given one Immigration Enforcement Agent to work its city jail in lieu of 287(g))
Maricopa County Sheriff’s Department (AZ) 
Phoenix Police Department (AZ) 

State Law Enforcement Agencies
Alabama State Police
Arizona Department of Corrections 
Arizona Department of Public Safety DPS/Highway Patrol 
Florida Department of Law Enforcement 
Massachusetts entered into an agreeement under Governor Mitt Romney, but incoming Governor said he intends to cancel agreement.

List of Agencies considering 287(g) Authority or pending MOA
Rogers, AR 
Springdale AR
Morristown P.D., NJ
Irving TX  City Council Rejected, Citizen Petition Circulating.
Tennessee Highway Patrol 
Herndon Police (VA) 
Culpeper Police (VA) 
Loudoun County Sheriff (VA) 
Manassas Police (VA)
Rutherford County (TN) 
Putnam County (VT) 
Carrolton Police (TX) 
Ottumwa Police (IA)
Waukegan Police Department (IL)

 

Technorati Tags

,  illegal aliens, ,  immigration enforcement

 

  digg this | del.icio.us

Homeland Security

Posted in Illegal Aliens & Immigration Reforms on September 18th, 2007 by MorningStar

 

  digg this | del.icio.us

Doing nothing is not a solution

Posted in Illegal Aliens & Immigration Reforms on September 17th, 2007 by MorningStar

The United States government does not want to deport any more illegal aliens than they are absolutely forced to deport.  From the presidential administration to the lowest level bureaucrat in the descending chain of multiple agencies, this policy may not be written down in black and white, but it would be impossible to make it any clearer.  This policy has not changed much in thirty years and despite which party controls the congress or the oval office, it has remained relatively consistent.  Not only does the federal government not want to deport the illegal aliens, they don’t want to even think of such a thing, because the fact of the matter is, they couldn’t do it if they wanted to.

There is no federal agency of the United States government that hunts down illegal aliens and deports them. 

The widely dispersed Border Patrol is charged with keeping illegal aliens out of the country along the border, however, the fact that approximately 8,000 illegal aliens successfully enter the country without authorization every day is not exactly a testament to the Border Patrol’s competence, and it should come as news to no one that the low morale of the Border Patrol agents is the result of giving too big a job and to too few people in a top-heavy agency with an over-abundance of poor quality, empire building, narcissists, politically appointed management control-freaks attempting to enforce on the rank and file agent, an operational policy that is entirely contrary to the express purpose for which they were created, and that is, the detection and prevention of the illegal entry of aliens and smuggling of illegal contraband into the United States across either the northern or the southern borders.  Once an illegal alien is past the Border Patrol’s area of surveillance, they are pretty much home free.  Unless they are caught committing a crime in one of the few scattered areas where the local police check the immigration status of those they arrest, they can go where they want without fear of being apprehended.

The Office of Detention and Removal Operations (DRO) is responsible for promoting public safety and national security by making certain through the enforcement of U.S. immigration laws that all removable aliens depart the United States, however by their own admission, they are not very good at what they do.  DRO is one of several support divisions in the investigative arm of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The DRO does not actively pursue the illegal aliens on their list and most federal and state law enforcement agencies along with the Social Security Administration and the IRS absolutely refuse to give them any assistance or information on the people they are suppose to be looking for.  The DRO merely waits until some other law enforcement agency apprehends one of their listed illegal aliens for a crime, and if by some miracle, they are notified, or they hear about one of their charges in the newspaper after he got drunk and ploughed his broken-down, uninsured car into a mini-van full of kindergarten children, then they can take action (such as it might be).  If they are not notified because of sanctuary policies or for some other reason, they are SOL.  Despite there being more than 20 million estimated illegal aliens currently in the country, this agencies list has less than 900,000 names on it.

The Compliance Enforcement Unit (CEU) of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is dedicated to the enforcement of nonimmigrant visa violations.  Their job is to monitor the millions of foreign students, tourists, and temporary workers present in the U.S. at any one time and identify those that violate the rules of their immigration status or overstay their visa.  The lack of resources and massive snags in their software development has rendered this group fairly inoperable.  Of the estimated 500,000 Visa violations recorded every year CEU manages to deal with approximately 3,000 cases. 

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has the overall responsibility for identify and remove illegal aliens, however, beyond the illegal aliens that make it to the DRO list of what the federal government considers to be a “criminal alien,” and those who would be listed by CEU if they had software that actually worked as it should (which they don’t), ICE is amazingly unconcerned about the growing number of illegal aliens.  Until they recently started stirring things up the news media and the liberal Democrats with sporadic workplace immigration raids, few people had even heard of ICE.  Despite the sensational news coverage their raids get in the press, at the rate they are now going it would take ICE more than 300 years to deport every illegal alien in this country.  Their effectiveness couldn’t get much lower, and “total incompetence” fails to adequately describe their performance.

Hunting down illegal aliens and deporting them is not the Border Patrol’s job, it is not the job of the Office of Detention and Removal Operations, the Compliance Enforcement Unit will get back to us on what their job is once they get their software to work so they can figure it out, and ICE has so many different jobs that all they can do is dabble with immigration enforcement like it was a passing hobby.  So in our vast system of government who’s job is it to hunt down illegal aliens and deport them?  It’s nobody’s job and the U.S. government wants to keep it that way. 

Julie Myers, the head of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is doing her part to convince the American people that it is far too costly to realistically consider the deportation of 12 million illegal aliens.  Ms. Myers’ publicly guesstimated that it would cost the federal government approximately $94 Billion dollars to find, detain and remove the 12 million illegal aliens her department estimate are in the United States today.  In all honesty, Julie Meyers is wildly exaggerating.  It would cost much more than what she has estimated.  The U.S. government has never before faced a problem of this magnitude and there is no specific group within the U.S. government that is designed to handle something of this nature. 

In 1954, President Dwight D. Eisenhower initiated “Operation Wetback,” to address the issue of an influx of illegal aliens from Mexico into the southwestern United States.   In a letter to Sen. William Fulbright, Eisenhower quoted a report in The New York Times that said: “The rise in illegal border-crossing by Mexican ‘wetbacks’ to a current rate of more than 1,000,000 cases a year has been accompanied by a curious relaxation in ethical standards extending all the way from the farmer-exploiters of this contraband labor to the highest levels of the Federal Government.”  Eisenhower was becoming increasingly concerned that profits from illegal labor led to corruption. An on-and-off guest-worker program for Mexicans was operating at the time, and farmers and ranchers in the Southwest were becoming far too dependent on the additional low-cost laborers that the guest-worker program supplied.  “Operation Wetback” began in California and Arizona and coordinated 1,075 Border Patrol agents along with state and local police agencies to mount a crackdown. There were police raids of Mexican-American neighborhoods, random stops and ID checks of people who appeared to be of Mexican descent in a region of the United States where many Native Americans and native Hispanics then lived.  Illegal aliens were deported along with their American-born children and the police were stopping people in the streets asking for identification papers. 750 agents targeted agricultural areas with a goal of 1000 apprehensions a day. By the end of July, 1954, over 50,000 aliens were caught in the two states. Approximately 488,000 people fled the country for fear of being apprehended. By September, 80,000 had been taken into custody in Texas, and the INS estimates that 500,000-700,000 people had left Texas voluntarily.  Those who were deported were put on buses and trains and taken deep into Mexico before being set free to discourage their return. Thousands more were put aboard two hired ships, the Emancipation and the Mercurio and ferried from Port Isabel, Texas, to Veracruz, Mexico, more than 500 miles south.  In a bit less than one year approximately 80,000 Mexican nationals had been deported and another 500,000 to 700,000 illegal aliens had voluntarily repatriated themselves to Mexico to avoid apprehension.

The United States currently has twenty times the number of illegal aliens that motivated former President Eisenhower to implement his program back in 1954.  The farmers and ranchers in the American Southwest have become even more dependent on the low-cost illegal alien labor than their predecessors were in 1954 but in the last 53 years the associated agricultural industry has gained significant political power that they didn’t have in 1954.  Today they openly flaunt the immigration laws of this country and ignore the government’s attempt to regulate guest workers.  The openly encourage illegal aliens to enter the U.S. and recruit illegal farm workers in rural areas on both sides of the border.  If the United States granted full amnesty to the estimated 20 million illegal aliens in the U.S. today, the farmers and ranchers would get rid of the newly legalized aliens working for them and recruit new illegal aliens to come to the U.S. and go to work for them. The newly legalized aliens would expect a higher wage along with their change in legal status, they would expect to be covered under Worker’s Compensation, and they might even begin to organize themselves into collective bargaining groups as they did after the 1986 amnesty.  The simple fact of the matter is that American farmers and ranchers will not use legal workers because it cuts into the profits they make and they know that as long as they continue to lobby Washington and dump money into the campaign coffers of American politicians they will be allowed to continue doing business the way they see fit and until the American people force their representatives in Washington to deal with the employers who are the root cause of the illegal alien problem, the problem will continue to grow.        

Former President Eisenhower clearly demonstrated the effectiveness of strong and aggressive enforcement and despite what Julie Myers would like the American people to think, the federal government cut significantly cut down the number of illegal aliens in this country for a lot less than $94 Billion dollars.  The mass deportation of 100,000 illegal aliens from the U.S. would throw every illegal alien in this country into a state of panic and hundreds of thousands would voluntarily leave the U.S. at their own expense.  According to Julie Myers’ own calculation the cost of deporting 100,000 illegal aliens would be around $4 billion dollars.  Another alternative would be to aggressively prosecute and imprison the owners of the top 1000 companies in the U.S. who hire illegal aliens.  When the consequences of running an illegal business outweigh the potential benefit few will be willing to take the risk, and when the employment opportunities for illegal aliens are gone, the illegal aliens will be gone as well. 

Regadless of how it is implemented, enforcement of the law is the one solution to the illegal alien problem that can guarantee success, doing nothing will only make the problem worse.

 

Technorati Tags

 illegal aliens,  amnesty,  farm workers, , , , , , , ,  agricultural industry

 

  digg this | del.icio.us

Homeland Security chief says terrorists have been arrested at border

Posted in Muslims, Terrorists & The Middle East on September 13th, 2007 by MorningStar

El Paso Times (TX), September 13, 2007
Dallas — Texas’ top homeland security official said Wednesday that terrorists with ties to Hezbollah, Hamas and al-Qaida have been arrested crossing the Texas border with Mexico in recent years.

‘Has there ever been anyone linked to terrorism arrested?’ Texas Homeland Security Director Steve McCraw said in a speech to the North Texas Crime Commission. ‘Yes, there was.’

His remarks appear to be among the most specific on the topic of terrorism arrests along the Texas-Mexico border. Local and elected officials have alluded to this happening but have been short on details.

McCraw’s remarks are similar to those made recently by National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell, who last month told the El Paso Times that a small number of people with known links to terrorist organizations have been caught crossing the border.

It would be prudent to remember that, by their own count, the federal government only catches 1 out of every 10 illegals entering the U.S., and if that small number, referred to in the paragraph above was somewhere between 5 and 20, then we can assume that they have missed anywhere from 45 to 90 terrorist infiltrators.  If it was between 20 and 100 we can safely assume that there may be as many as 8 to 9 hundred Islamic Terrorists out wandering American streets hunting for a target to hit.  It only took 19 of these characters to kill more than 3000 men, women and children on September 11, 2001.  Can you imagine how many people  60, 70 or 300 of those individuals could slaughter?  With luck and a little planning the affect could be devastating in many ways.

 

Technorati Tags

, , ,  Islamic terrorist,  terrorists

 

  digg this | del.icio.us