Obama Merchandise – Cheap Christmas Presents For The Democrats On Your List

Posted in Politics & Government on November 25th, 2008 by MorningStar

For anyone who has a few dollars left after the economic catastrophe and is looking for some really unique Christmas presents for that special person in their life, I have compiled the following list of awesome gift suggestions. None of these items will set you back much, the cost for anything listed below is downright cheap. Essentially the low cost of these goods pretty much matches the quality.

This collection came about as a result of a discussion with my wife this morning. I was telling her about my entrepreneurial scheme to start making and selling chocolate colored soap on a rope shaped like Obama’s head with the catchy marketing phrase “Hope On A Rope,” and she was telling me that I was out of my mind.  She was no doubt considering the adverse consequences that might result from selling soap shaped like our new black president’s head dangling from the end of a rope.  She is normally right on such things, but not one to be dissuaded by naysayers; after our brief discussion I was looking around the net for information on how to make soap when I discovered that somebody had already beat me to the punch. To make matters worse, they used my catchy marketing phrase as well.  The nerve of some people!  And the soap’s not even brown!

Disappointed, I started looking at all of the other Obama offerings out there and was amazed at the wide diversity of products available. Since it is now obvious that I am not going to get rich selling “Hope On A Rope,” I figured I may as well share these discoveries with anyone out there who might be interested in blowing a few bucks on junky merchandise that is virtually guaranteed to be a disappointment.

All things considered, the low quality of this merchandise is fairly well aligned with the Democratic candidate just elected to the White House – guaranteed to be a disappointment. Then again, with his politics, we may all need some of those air fresheners and the condoms might come in handy when we are getting screwed with tax increases.

Obama Junk

Hope on a Rope – Barack Obama Soap

Barack Obama Butt Wipe

Obama Condoms
Guaranteed to not leave a bitter taste in your mouth!!

Obama Air Freshener

Obama Gold Coin – Genuine 24 Karat Gold for $9.99!

Obama Plates, Mouse Pads. Coffee cups, Shot glasses, Beer mugs, etc.

Obama Underwear

Obama Bobblehead Dolls, Obama Action Figures, Obama Paper Dolls, Obama Sponge Rubber Squeeze Toy

Barack Obama Chew Toy For Dogs

 

 

Technorati Tags

 

digg this | del.icio.us

Share

San Francisco’s Reaps the Whirlwind – Part III

Posted in Illegal Aliens & Immigration Reforms on November 19th, 2008 by MorningStar

Rony Aguilera, 17, (aka “Guerrillero”) an illegal alien and a member of the Mara Salvatrucha street gang, has been arrested and charged in the July 31 murder of a a 14-year-old San Francisco boy, Ivan Miranda, who was nearly decapitated after Aguilera killed the boy with a sword.

Aguilera who is an illegal alien from Honduras, was known to the San Francisco police as a member of the violent MS-13 street gang and as an illegal alien who was arrested last year in an assault case after he and another member of the gang attacked a 16-year-old boy at Hill and Valencia streets in the Mission District on the afternoon of June 27, 2007. Fortunately that victim was left alive after Aguilera & friends were done kicking and beating him.

Following Aguilera’s arrest in the 2007 assault, San Francisco authorities became aware of his illegal alien status but chose to ignore it and did not refer Aguilera to federal immigration officials because doing so would violate San Francisco’s sanctuary city law. As a direct result of their failure to consider the safety of their citizens, a juvenile court judge allowed Aguilera to be released to his parents in Houston for a very brief term of probation (less than six months) and when that was over he immediately returned to San Francisco and demonstrated his gratitude to the misguided city by murdering one of their children with a sword.

San Francisco’s Mayor Gavin Newsom, who has continued to support the city’s sanctuary law while its citizens are randomly slaughtered, has announced his intention to run for governor of California in 2010. Los Angeles Mayor, Antonio Villaraigosa, another pro-sanctuary, open borders Democrat along with Lt. Gov. John Garamendi, Atty. Gen. (and former California governor) Jerry (moonbeam) Brown, Senator Dianne Feinstein and a host of others have also announced their intentions to run for the office vacated by the entirely worthless Arnold Schwarzenegger.

There is little reason to believe that Californian’s will wise up to the dangerous situation that is being created by sanctuary cities before 2010, or that they will elect any significant change along the way.

Suspect in boy’s slaying avoided deportation

 

Technorati Tags

 illegal aliens, , ,  Gavin Newsome

 

digg this | del.icio.us

Share

The American Media’s New Role

Posted in News Events & Media Censorship on November 19th, 2008 by MorningStar

Anyone out there who is still depending on the Democratic party’s puppet media for accurate news and information might be surprised to learn that the American military, it’s remaining coalition partners and the Iraqi army have combined forces to annihilate the last remaining band of organized Al-Qaeda terrorists in Iraq. In what the British press has called “the culmination of one of the most spectacular victories of the war on terror,” the Iraqi army combined forces with the Americans’ 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment and other coalition forces to crush the 1,200 remaining Al-Qaeda fighters staging a defiant “last stand” in the northern city of Mosul. (See: “Iraqis lead final purge of Al-Qaeda” )

Operation Lion’s Roar, the combined force operation to crush the 1,200 surviving holdouts of a terrorist force that was once estimated to number more than 12,000 began on May 10 has already resulted in the death of Abu Khalaf, the Al-Qaeda leader, and the death or capture of more than 1,000 Al-Qaeda terrorists, and those who have managed to survive the onslaught have been reduced to sporadic hit-and-run attacks, assassination attempts on local authorities and sporadic bombings purposely targeting large gatherings of civilians.

Meanwhile, as a result of the concentrated effort by American special forces along the Syrian border, as well as last months attack on a Syrian terrorist training camp, the number of foreign fighters coming over the border from Syria as Al-Qaeda replacements has decreased dramatically. At it’s peak, the Syrian’s were sending as many as 120 newly trained terrorists into Iraq every month, but the increased border security along with last month’s controversial attack of a terrorist training facility inside Syria, has worked to limit the flow of replacements, and it is now estimated that fewer than two dozen new insurgents manage to enter Iraq each month and most are quickly apprehended.

While this extremely positive news has been carried on the front pages of newspapers around the world since the middle of summer, the American news media has largely declined to publish anything that might detract from their continuing effort to portray George W. Bush and the entire Republican Party in the worst of all possible lights because of the potential impact such positive revelations might have on the November election. However, the November elections are behind us and the future of the American nation is securely held in the nimble fingers of extremely liberal prestidigitators poised to entertain us with startling feats of inexplicable mystery. America’s liberal controlled press has managed to pull off the biggest con job of the last thousand years and could now return to reporting the news with some meager sense of objectivity if they desired. Unfortunately, we may never see the American media’s return to an expected level of normalcy. The role of myth maker, trend setter, and ultimate judge of all things true and false, is an awesome position of power, and it is not the sort of position that is easily abandoned, and going back to their previous job of relaying dull factual information to the masses must seem pretty boring in comparison to playing the role of a modern day God.

Whether or not the American public will ever realize that the news media’s switch from reality to fantasy has been made is anyone’s guess. I have my own personal doubt. By and large, there appears to be far more stupid people out there that we ever imagined possible. The sad fact of the matter is that they have become the majority and our last election proved this beyond any reasonable doubt. These are people who don’t want to waste precious time thinking; they prefer being told what to think and seem very content with things as they are now. The American news media may feel a strong obligation to provide these dummies with future guidance, and insofar as this army of gullible idiots are the controlling force in American politics, the American media, with it’s talent for persuasion, can exercise a far greater degree of control over the future of this nation than ever before.

If anything is made clear in all of this it is the simple fact that American “journalism” as defined by the terms “objective reporting” is a dead and putrefying corpse laying across the American landscape, and we are entering a new era of American propaganda where government policy is set from behind the scenes by amateur puppeteers manipulating the strings of the gullible. Sadly enough, what is even clearer is that this artificial construction can’t last long before it collapses, and we should be asking ourselves what will suffer the most damage amidst the falling rubble of its demise?

 

Technorati Tags

,  al Qaeda,  American Military,  Iraq war,  terrorists, ,  Democratic Party,  Republican Party

 

digg this | del.icio.us

Share

CDC Investigating Widespread Outbreak Of White Guilt

Posted in In General on November 12th, 2008 by MorningStar

OFFICIAL ANNOUNCEMENT

The CDC has been working with state and local health departments and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to investigate a large, multi-state outbreak of White Guilt. This outbreak appears to be just appearing and the CDC and state health departments are just beginning to conduct surveillance for cases of infection with the outbreak strain. Public health officials will continue to analyze data gathered during the investigations and update the public on this emergency situation.

On October 25, 2008 the California Department of Health notified CDC that twenty-four people appeared to be suffering the symptoms commonly associated with the outbreak strain of White Guilt and 15 other persons with White Guilt whose symptoms had not yet become profound enough to clearly identify. In the days that followed the initial alarm, cases of White Guilt continued to be reported and the outbreak expanded to include 43 states, the District of Columbia and even into Canada.

The CDC and its public health partners on the federal, state and local levels searched for the source of the outbreak and are trying to decide what steps are necessary to stop transmission of the infection. The investigators depended on the cooperation of hundreds of ill and well persons across the country who answered questions about what news reports they had recently viewed, the daily newspapers they read and how many diversity training seminars they have attended in the past twelve months. This data will allow investigators to link the spread of the illness with the high rate of published nonsense about race relations and the revision of historical events. In addition, public health officials in several states, with the assistance of CDC, are investigating clusters of ill persons who have been subjected to racial nonsense taught in elementary schools by amateur child psychologists posing as grade school teachers. FDA and state investigators traced the origin of some White Guilt infestations back to early childhood trauma inflicted by school administrators endeavoring to level the racial playing field by blaming white children for the acts of their ancestors.

To this point, the investigation appears to be strongly indicating that White Guilt is a psychological affliction resulting from children being exposed, during their formative years, to intense brain washing intentionally designed to eradicate their racial identity and instill in their young minds a deep sense of shame and humiliation for the fact that their pale skin is God’s way of letting the world know that their ancestors committed crimes against people of color. More detailed information about the ongoing outbreak investigation may be found in the Weekly Report of Morbidity and Mortality.

Since the initial outbreak on October 25, 2008, millions of American citizens appear to have been infected with White Guilt and the same genetic fingerprint has been identified in 43 states, the District of Columbia, and Canada. This has not been a difficult factor for investigators to identify because everyone infected up to this point in time appears to be a honky. There were a few isolated exceptions where three black men appeared to be suffering from the infection but investigators later discovered that in two of those cases the individuals were merely suffering from constipation and in the third instance, inflamed hemorrhoids were found to be the root cause of the patient’s suffering.

Complete demographic information has become available for 20,000 infected people. Of these, 52% were female, of the 48% that are male 86% are gay, 100% were white and educated in the United States, 83% were registered Democrats, 69% profess to be pacifistic atheists or agnostics, 96% jog an average of three times a week, 100% of the infected subscribe to one or more liberal newspapers controlled entirely by the Democratic Party and 59% had one or more “Save The Whales” or “Love The Animals” bumper stickers on their automobiles.

Patients range in age from 10 to 45 years old and tests indicate that most possess the average maturity and logical capacity of a fourteen year old girl. There are particularly high incidence rates in Los Angeles, San Francisco, New York, all of the New England states, Chicago, Michigan, Washington D.C. and most large metropolitan areas of the nation. There have been reported a minimum of 9,000 cases so extreme that anti-psychotic drugs and antidepressants have been required and 23 cases have resulted in suicidal behavior requiring hospitalization.

The progress of this outbreak can be visually described with a chart showing the number of persons who became ill each day. This chart is called an epidemic curve or epi curve. Please see the interpretation of epidemic curves during this active outbreak. It shows that the number of persons who are becoming ill has not yet peaked, however, epidemiologists expect that the data will show the peak rate of infection to occur within two weeks following the election of Barack Obama and may taper off slightly after that. Due to personal embarrassment, extreme timidity and a general lack of self-confidence on the part of the infected, it is likely that many more illnesses have occurred than those reported. Some of these unreported illnesses may be in states that are not on today’s map.

Clinical features of White Guilt Infection
White Guilt is characterized by the overwhelming compulsion to feel a false sense of remorse for the actions of white slave owners who died more than 100 years ago. No actual association between the infected persons and those long dead slave owners is readily apparent. Symptoms include the irresistible urge among patients to act as if they enjoy rap music, to talk as if they have little command of the English language, to engage in long-winded verbal rants about the evils of a white-dominated society, engage in bizarre habits of dress, such as wearing loud mismatched colors, “do” rags and wide-brimmed hats with brass buckles, and the peculiar habit of bumping fists and addressing others as “Bro,” “Brohamsky” and similar terms. Many cases are characterized by stuttering, thumb sucking, stammering, increased frequency of masturbation, and the inability to identify oneself or loved ones in a diverse crowd along with a general loss of self-esteem.

Advice to citizens
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) continue to remind everyone to wash all vegetables before eating them. They are grown in fields fertilized with cow shit for Christ’s sake, and the people who pick them aren’t known for their fastidious habit of hand washing. Anyone eating produce without first washing it deserves a good case of the shits as a reminder of where that stuff is grown and the sort of lowlife people we pay almost nothing to pick and process it.

American citizens are also reminded that a strong racial identity is necessary for the development of a healthy personality and that racism is a state of ignorance shared by just as many African Americans and Hispanics as it is by white people. All American citizens need to come to terms with the simple fact that slavery in the United States ended 143 years ago and now that we have elected a black president, racism in the United States is officially dead and buried and we have proved to the world that people of color can be just as spoiled, arrogant and elitist as the most pampered white person. The heinous actions of long dead slave owners 143 years ago is no longer a valid excuse for being on welfare for years on end, for not finishing high school, or for being a burden on society. Everybody is now on their own and will be accepted or rejected on their own merits. Contact your elected representatives about the establishment of a White History and Heritage month now that the era of racial nonsense is officially in remission.

More information about White Guilt and this ongoing investigation will be released as data is compiled and developments occur.

 

Technorati Tags

 White Guilt

 

digg this | del.icio.us

Share

The Tyranny of the Elite – Denying The Will Of California’s Citizens

Posted in California - Politics & Government on November 11th, 2008 by MorningStar

Assembly Speaker Karen Bass, Senate President Pro Tem Don Perata, incoming President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg and forty other Democratic state legislators in California signed onto a friend of the court brief, filed with the state Supreme Court on Monday in the effort to void Proposition 8 along with the will of the California voters who overwhelmingly gave it their support.

With nearly 11 million votes already counted, Proposition 8, which would prohibit same sex marriage, is considered a done deal with the support of 52.3% of the state’s voters and 47.7% voting in opposition, and despite the fact that there are still ballots left to be counted, the current 500,000 spread is unlikely to change. Ironically, the state of California had a record breaking voter turnout dominated by registered Democrats and exit polls indicated that 70% of the African American voters supported the measure as well as the majority of Hispanic voters, however, the Democratic legislators intent on overturning the will of their constituents are describing the 500,000 vote margin a “bare majority.”

The attorneys at the law firm of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, retained with money raised from the same California taxpayers who voted in favor of the proposition, were hired to draft the brief on behalf of the Democratic legislators opposed to it.

The brief filed with the California Supreme Court contends that Proposition 8 compromises “the enduring constitutional promise of equal protection under the law,” and that it, “seeks to effect a monumental revision of this foundational principle and constitutional structure by allowing a bare majority of voters to eliminate a fundamental right of a constitutionally protected minority group.” Included in the document is the warning from the legislators to the notoriously liberal justices of the state’s Supreme Court, “If Proposition 8 takes effect, this court will no longer be the final arbiter of the rights of minorities.”

Proposition 8 was drafted to correct the May 15, 2008 travesty of the state’s Supreme Court when it overturned Proposition 22 which was passed with an overwhelming 61.4% of votes back in 2000 to prevent California from recognizing same-sex marriages. By overturning Proposition 22 the state Supreme Court rejected the will of the California voters and legalized same sex marriages.

Unfortunately, the California citizens who voted to support the passage of Proposition 8 will be forced to rely on the state’s Attorney General and former Governor, Jerry (Moonbeam) Brown, to defend the initiative in court. Jerry Brown attempted to scuttle the passage of Proposition 8 earlier this year by manipulating the wording of the proposition’s description contained in the state’s ballot pamphlet. While Brown never came right out and said that he opposed the proposition, he joined San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and Lt. Gov. John Garamendi at a Hollywood fundraiser for the “No on 8″ campaign held a few days prior to the election. Brown, like Newsome, Villaraigosa and Garamendi is expected to throw his hat into the ring for the office of California state governor in 2010. Another good indication of where Jerry Brown stands on the state’s prohibition of gay marriages is the fact that he has used the authority of his office to counter claims by pro-prop 8 supporters that the language of the proposition was intended to invalidate all same-sex marriages “regardless of when or where performed,” while Jerry Brown has argued that, “I believe that marriages that have been entered into subsequent to the (May 15) Supreme Court opinion will be recognized by the California Supreme Court.” Clearly, with Jerry Brown defending the will of the people of California on the issue of prohibiting gay marriages, it is safe to assume that Proposition 8, like Proposition 22 before it, will be overturned by the California Supreme Court regardless of what the people of this state want.

The essential position of the Democratic legislators and the majority of elected Democratic officials in California as succinctly and clearly expressed in the Associated Press article published in the San Jose Mercury News and elsewhere around the state, held that Proposition 8 should be tossed out by the Supreme Court because “the California voters do not have the authority to change the state’s laws.”

Admittedly, the perspective of California’s Democratic legislators as summarized in the thirteen word statement, “the California voters do not have the authority to change the state’s laws,” appears to be glaringly blunt and forthright in it’s simplicity, but is also a statement that is heavily laden with a lot of implications and it could be interpreted in a number of negative ways. The simple fact of the matter is that it would be difficult to find a way to interpret the statement in a positive light.
Oddly enough, on October 10, 1911, when the state of California became the 10th state to adopt the initiative process, it was with the understanding promoted by then Governor Hiram Johnson, that it would serve the people of this state as a tool they could use to adopt laws and constitutional amendments without the support of the Governor or the Legislature, and the package of constitutional amendments placed on the state’s ballot 97 years ago to make that tool available to the citizens of this state was purposely designed with the express intention of giving the people of California more control over what was included or excluded from the state’s constitution. Furthermore, it is a well established fact of the state’s historical record that the California initiative process was passed into law with every intention that it would give the people of this state the full authority to implement laws and constitutional amendments as they saw fit and without regard for the opposing views of California’s notoriously corrupt, manipulative and ethically challenged elected representatives.

It seems to me, given the express intention for implementing the state’s initiative process, that the people of California have the right and the authority to amend the state’s constitution as well as the right and authority to propose, pass and implement any law they deem necessary for whatever reason, and if the Democratic legislators opposing the passage of Proposition 8 do not like what the people of this state have done they would be better off in the long run concentrating their effort on abolishing the initiative process and silencing the will of the people forever than they will be by attacking the will of the people in the overly biased and extremely liberal California Supreme Court on this one issue.

Article 2, Section 1 of the California Constitution clearly states “All political power is inherent in the people. Government is instituted for their protection, security, and benefit, and they have the right to alter or reform it when the public good may require.” However, despite the obvious intention of the law, the liberal California Supreme Court has seen fit on a number of occasions to disregard the will of the California’s voters and reject both laws and constitutional amendments submitted, approved and passed by a majority of the state’s registered voters on the flimsiest of pretenses and every time the state’s left-leaning Supreme Court justices spit in the faces of California’s citizenry they inch that much closer to the inevitable day when the Golden State’s very independent, but civic minded citizens stage a full scale revolt. It has happened before and only the extremely foolish would dismiss the possibility that it can happen again, and the only way that the politicians of this state can safely and completely ensure that a voter rebellion does not occur and never occurs at any point in the future, is to entirely abolish the constitutional right of California’s citizens to express their demands through the initiative process.

Ultimately, this whole thing begs the question, why even let the common people of this state vote in an election?” Clearly the state legislators feel that they should be the ones to control the direction of the state in all matters. They are the ones who are trusted to see the big picture so they should be trusted with the power to dictate what and when, changes will occur. The rank and file citizenry of this state have no place in the lofty determinations made by these living deities and surely our paltry attempts to influence their despotic commandments can be safely disregarded as the inconsequential mutterings of the peasant rabble far too ignorant to know what we really want or what will actually benefit us. Obviously, if the citizens of California are willing to repeatedly acquiesce to the biased Supreme Court and the smarmy state legislators who overturn the legitimate changes we enact, then we may as well just shut our mouths and keep our ideas to ourselves because we have no right to control anything and the entire concept of Democracy in California is clearly dead, and ironically enough, it was our tax money that went to hire the assassins who killed it.

 

Technorati Tags

 Proposition 8,  Gavin Newsome,  Antonio Villaraigosa,  Jerry Brown,  Karen Bass,  Don Perata,  Darrell Steinberg,  John Garamendi

 

digg this | del.icio.us

Share

The Reign Of The Magic Negro

Posted in Politics & Government on November 9th, 2008 by MorningStar

When the Bush administration began to use signing statements to broaden the scope of executive power the Democrats began to froth at the mouth and started sputtering about tyranny, but now that the Democrats are going to be running the show, Obama’s transition chief, John Podesta has said that Obama intends to use the same questionable strategy to quickly undo many of the policies enacted during the eight years of the Bush administration. “I think that he feels like he has a real mandate for change”, Podesta said, “There’s a lot that the president can do using his executive authority without waiting for congressional action.

Exactly how far Obama will go with the use of executive powers to implement changes is anybody’s guess. Without the U.S. Congress on his back constantly like Bush had, Obama’s use of Executive Powers will be pretty much unopposed. He could use the authority of his office to reverse the trend towards stronger immigration enforcement, and he could use that same power to shut down the Guantanamo Bay detention camp, broaden the scope of stem cell research, to reverse the abortion restrictions President Bush imposed on U.S. international aid, or to strengthen the restrictions against oil and gas drilling inside the United States that George W. Bush reduced earlier this year.

Obama is determined to implement wide sweeping change in quick order and it is unlikely that he can accomplish much waiting for the Democratic controlled U.S. Congress to collect what few wits they have between them and put something in motion. He believes he has a mandate from the voters demanding change,  and in his role as the magical negro,  he is determined to make so many changes that we never forget that he was once president. He can accomplish a lot of things that will have an immediate impact on the lives of the American citizens by using his executive power to dictate the changes he feels are required while leaving congress out of the loop.

The most obvious problem with all of this is that we have on man essentially acting on his own to effect the changes he personally deems necessary, which when you think about it pretty much defines the term “dictatorship.” The other thing is that it was exactly this sort of thing that made George W. Bush so unpopular. However, the same identical tactics, when used by a Democratic president, may be viewed in an entirely different manner and it is doubtful that Obama will have the news media slashing away at him with straight razors like Bush had throughout the eight years of his administration. In all likelihood, Barack Obama will be given extreme latitude to do as he sees fit, and as long as his actions don’t directly result in widespread disaster, there will be little dissent. Even if his actions do directly result in widespread disaster it is unlikely that we are going to hear much out of the news media; after all, they are the people who put him in the White House.

 

Technorati Tags

 

digg this | del.icio.us

Share

The Fat Lady Sings

Posted in Politics & Government on November 4th, 2008 by MorningStar

Obviously, I was dead wrong about the American people not being so stupid as to put a nearly black Marxist in the White House because by 8:30 pm (California Time) last night the Associated Press called the race for Obama and McCain conceded shortly thereafter. The unthinkable has happened and I have sincere doubts that the political environment of this nation will ever again come close to a balance. All we can do now is wait and watch.

 

digg this | del.icio.us

Share

Looking On The Bright Side

Posted in Politics & Government on November 4th, 2008 by MorningStar

If there can be a bright side to Obama winning this election it is in the certainty that four years from now Barack Obama and the Democratic Party will have screwed everything up so bad that no doubt remains among any American voter as to exactly who the bumbling idiots in Washington really are, and from the depths of the hole we are in four years from now the Democrats will be rudely ejected from most positions of authority and we will not have to listen to their nasal whining excuses for at least twenty years to follow.

Another bright spot on the horizon is the thought of an Obama administration when the media honeymoon is over and the sharks begin to circle as things begin to go wrong, mistakes are inevitably made, or Obama gets caught with his pants down around his ankles entertaining an aide in the oval office. The guy is too arrogant to escape being impaled on some slick investigative writer’s blood filled pen. His entire life history is one giant fabrication and eventually the truth will come out and the party will begin.

Another good thing about an Obama presidency is that it will mean the death grip of the white race on power in American politics is over and the end of the civil rights movement is at hand. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton can retire knowing they’ve won the good fight. We don’t need to hear from them anymore because there is a black man in the Whitehouse and there’s no need for quotas, busing, discrimination claims or diversity training because everyone finally has an equal footing in life.

There are probably a lot more positive things that I could think up to add to this list but I don’t want to overtax my mind until I find out for sure that I need to.

 

Technorati Tags

 

digg this | del.icio.us

Share

13 Year Old Somalian Rape Victim Stoned To Death

Posted in Around the World on November 3rd, 2008 by MorningStar

One thousand cheering spectators filled a stadium in the port city of Kismayo, Somalia to watch as a thirteen year old girl, the victim of a gang rape by three adult males, was stoned to death by an estimated fifty men tasked with the chore of dealing out “justice” under the nation’s Islamic code of law that penalizes the victims of rape with a cruel death for their participation in the crime of adultery while the men who perpetrated the deed go free.

On October 27, 2008, Aisha Ibrahim Duhulow, 13 years old, was stoned by a group of at least fifty men. When they believed her dead she was tossed into a hole and buried, however, a doubt was raised concerning her death and a group of nurses were called in and required to dig her up. After the nurses declared that despite the stoning and being briefly buried alive, the little girl was still alive, the stoning recommenced until it was certain that she was dead and Islam was, at last  free of the stain she had placed on it. None of men she accused of the rape were arrested or detained.

A report by Amnesty International states that shots were fired into a crowd of people who may have attempted to save the little girl from her fate and that one young boy was killed in the attempt. Whether or not Aisha’s family members were among the group fired on is unknown.

What can anyone possibly say about something of this nature? What sort of “religion” demands the death of rape victims while assigning no blame to the perpetrators of this vicious crime? This sort of thing cannot be excused as some sort of “cultural” or “religious” difference, and the fact that it is a somewhat regular occurrence in Moslem countries defy any attempts to marginalize these horrible deeds as being the actions of a few misguided religious zealots. The cold-blooded murder of this innocent little girl is symptomatic of a fundamental perversity inherent in the Islamic religion, and it is something that every non-Islamic person and nation on this planet should sit up and take note of.

 

Technorati Tags

 Aisha Duhulow,  Somalia,  Islam

 

digg this | del.icio.us

Share

Barack Obama, Louis Farrakhan And The Delusional White Element

Posted in Politics & Government on November 3rd, 2008 by MorningStar

Louis Farrakhan, the leader of the black militant Nation of Islam endorsed Obama in a videotaped speech to his followers at Mosque Miryam in Chicago in February when he stated about the Democratic candidate, “You are the instruments that God is gonna use to bring about universal change, and that is why Barack has captured the youth,” Farrakhan said shortly before telling them that Obama was the new “messiah.”

After the Clinton campaign heard the comments about Obama from Louis Farrakhan demands were made that Obama “renounce” Farrakhan because of the anti-Semitic comments he has made in the past, and during the Democratic primary season earlier this year Obama gave the news media the impression that he was denouncing Farrakhan without actually doing so. What Obama said was that he denounced Farrakhan’s comments but that was the extent of it. He didn’t criticize the man nor did he denounce him personally, he merely denounced a selection of his comments, and despite saying in one appearance on Meet the Press, “You know, I have been very clear in my denunciation of Minister Farrakhan’s anti-Semitic comments,” he was not very clear at all.

Louis Farrakhan, the anti-Semitic leader of the black militant Nation of Islam, is just one more name to the growing list of unsavory friends and associates of Barack Obama that the Democratic candidate has sought to distance himself from, at least temporarily, for the sake of his campaign image. Louis Farrakhan has publically denounced Jews as being satanic bloodsuckers and degenerates who promote “the filth of Hollywood,” the “lesbianism” and “homosexuality” that is corrupting the American people and the people of the world and destroying their moral strength.

After Farrakhan praised and endorsed Obama as the new messiah, the Democratic candidate felt backed into a corner and felt the need to put some distance between himself and Farrakhan’s racist comments but he chose his words very carefully in doing so because Obama has admired Farrakhan for many years, and according to Dr. Vibert White Jr., who spent much of his adult life as a member and top officer of the Nation of Islam, Barack Obama’s ties to the black nationalist movement in Chicago run deep and the relationship between Obama and Louis Farrakhan is close. Dr. White admitted to a Newsmax reporter that Barack Obama and Louis Farrakhan have maintained “an open line between them” to discuss policy and strategy, either directly or through intermediaries despite Obama’s false claim that, “we’re not doing anything, I assure you, formally or informally with Minister Farrakhan.”

In 1995, while Obama was running for the Illinois State Senate, the Chicago Reader newspaper revealed that Barack Obama took time off from his campaign schedule to attend Farrakhan’s Million Man March in Washington, D.C. which he later described to that newspaper as being “a powerful demonstration” by African-American men trying to “affirm our rightful place in society,” a society in which Obama believes, “white Americans couldn’t care less about the profound problems African-Americans are facing.”

However, in 2008, as the American voters were closing in on the final days of the campaign Barack Obama has carefully avoided the use of terms such as “white Americans,” and any mention of the “Black nationalism” that has been championed by people such as Louis Farrakhan, Jeremiah A. Wright, Malcolm X, the Black Panthers, and yes, even by Barack Hussein Obama, the Democratic candidate whose personal identity crisis has resulted in an obviously conflicted human being who, despite being 50% Caucasian from his mother’s side and 43.75% Arabic from his father’s side, has identified himself with the small remaining 6.25% African Negro trickling bloodline of his Kenyan grandfather.

The length to which Barack Obama has gone to avoid any mention of race during a political race in which his campaign staff has exercised every extreme measure to keep race in the forefront and to launch unwarranted allegations of racial impropriety against Obama’s opponent, should be noted by American voters for it’s significance. It would be completely naive for anyone to believe that Obama’s campaign staff have been acting independently and that he has not carefully analyzed every “leak,” “rumor,” and tidbit of gossip strategically released by them to the media. Barack Obama has a firm hand on his entire campaign and nothing is released to the media that he doesn’t know about and approve of, and he knows that he needs to avoid scaring off the white voters with his strong Black Nationalist beliefs while at the same time he needs to let African Americans know that he is, as Farrakhan claimed, their “Messiah.” This precarious balancing act is further complicated by the need to appeal to the growing population of Latino voters who, more often than not, view African Americans with a mutual sense of hostility resulting from the many years of racially charged turf battles in large cities such as the highly censored race war between blacks and Hispanics that has claimed so many lives in South Los Angeles over the last year.

So far, Barack Obama has demonstrated a high degree of proficiency in his effort to maintain this complex balancing act and the American voters, one day before the election, remain clueless about the candidate’s actual preference, or who, four years into the future, will be seen as the largest benefactor of his victory. The one obvious fact that Obama avoids most is that he clearly does have a preference and that somewhere down this road the American people will discover that when one minority group gains ground, it is at the expense of another.

A good gauge of Obama’s success is today’s edition of the Los Angeles Times which carried a collection of quotes by white liberals intent on appeasing their false sense of guilt for the poor way Americans have treated Blacks in the past, and the general feeling among this groups is that a victory for Obama will show the world that “we’re not just the slavery nation, the Jim Crow nation,” and that it will be “a victory for diversity and an atonement for past sins.” The article concludes with the implication that white people should feel guilty for the way Blacks have been treated in the U.S. and those that don’t are sociopathic.

Slavery in North America existed for 211 years and ended with the adoption the Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution in 1865. Over a good portion of that time both white people and black were forced into involuntary servitude and served as slaves to masters who were predominantly white, however black slave owners also existed. Since 1865 but most notably since the late 1950′s, the American people have dedicated themselves to the abolition of widespread discriminatory practices on every basis, and in the United States today, African Americans, like every other minority race and sexual preference and degree of physical disability, have every opportunity afforded to white, well educated, heterosexual males who are physically fit. Educational attainment, business opportunity, career advancement and financial prosperity in the United States today are made available to everyone who is willing to claim them and the misguided notion that white people still have the stain of sin for which they must atone to the black race by making them more equal than all others, is a perverted and delusional belief fostered and encouraged by manipulative black race baiters that have built financial fortunes off their ability to amplify the division between people of different colors, a strategy that Barack Obama has seen the effectiveness of, and has used for his own benefit in the race for the Whitehouse that will end tomorrow.

 

Technorati Tags

, ,

 

digg this | del.icio.us

Share