Irish Illegal’s Allege Discrimination Over Minimally Increased Apprehension and Deportation Rates

Posted in Illegal Aliens & Immigration Reforms on October 29th, 2009 by MorningStar

Irish Central, the home page for Irish Voice, the leading Irish-American newspaper and Irish American magazine reported on October 27th that Irish illegal aliens are increasingly being targeted by the US Immigration Enforcement authorities.

In the last twelve months a total of 117 illegal Irish have been deported from the United States. This is a total increase of 23 over 2008 when only 94 illegal Irish were deported. In the same 12 month period of time 456 Irish were denied entry into the US for reasons not stated in the news release. Furthermore, the article claims that the number of Irish citizens visiting the United States has dropped by 28% in the last year alone. The increased apprehension rate of illegal alien Irish is not even remotely discriminatory in nature and it would be an entirely futile waste of good money to entertain any allegations of this nature. If anything, it appears to substantiate the federal government’s claim that the effort to apprehend illegal aliens is being pursued without discrimination or favor. Illegal aliens from Mexico, Europe, South America, Africa, Canada, England and Ireland all need to be apprehended and deported. There is nothing discriminatory about treating criminals like criminals.

While the vast majority of my mother’s family came to America from Ireland many years ago, they all came here either as free legal immigrants or they purchased passage by agreeing to serve as indentured servants. An Even earlier group, the lucky survivors of Oliver Cromwell’s genocidal campaign against Irish Catholics during a dark period of Irish history that decimated the Irish population from nearly two million to a bit above 600,000, were rounded up and sold into a life time of slavery in the British East colonies along the Amazon River or in Bermuda and the Barbados. Some of their sons and grandsons made their way to the American colonies as sailors and served on the side of freedom during the American Revolution and won their citizenship in a free America, but most died from malnutrition and disease under the harsh conditions of their sadistic British overlords. The history of Ireland and Irish immigrants is filled with stains of their blood and the tears of hopeless dismay. The persecution, suffering and discrimination they have been forced to endure over the years is as bad as any other group has ever suffered, but even still, that long suffering gives them no special license in a nation where all men are considered equal.

Generally speaking, the Irish people are a hard working and tenacious lot and the economic situation in Ireland today is as bad as it is here in the United States. I can sympathize with their desire for a better life, just as I sympathize with the Mexican and South American people who brave the Sonoran desert for the opportunities they believe they will find in our nation. However, entering the United States without proper authorization form the Immigration and Naturalization department is a crime and those who violate our nation’s immigration laws are criminals. It doesn’t matter if they are white, black, brown or green, if they come here without authorization they are criminals and everyone of them, regardless of color, religion, or country of origin should be deported.

There are thousands of people in Ireland, England, Mexico, the South American countries and all across Africa that have filed their immigration papers to come to the U.S. and many of them have waited patiently for years before they are given that opportunity. They are legal immigrants who want to come here, they want to fit in, work hard, prosper to the level they are capable of and participate in the future growth of our nation as American citizens. They are an asset to this nation and to the American people and they deserve to be recognized for the persistence of their dream and the tenacity required to achieve what they have worked hard to accomplish.

The individuals who sneak across our borders or purposely overstay their visas with the intention of remaining here illegally have clearly demonstrated their lack of respect for American laws they have violated. To remain her for any length of time they must violate additional American laws. They falsify documents to create new identities or they steal the identities of American citizens in order to find employment, obtain driver’s licenses, automobile insurance, credit cards and everything else that most American citizens take for granted. Entering the United States without the proper authorization is merely the first step on the path of numerous criminal violations that follow after as the illegal alien struggles to evade apprehension and eventual deportation. Furthermore, the estimated 40 million illegal aliens currently in the United States are the primary source of profit for numerous criminal enterprises that have evolved over the years for the sole purpose of opportunistically taking every advantage imaginable to fulfill the needs of the illegal population while accumulating large unreported profits. The Mexican drug cartels have moved into the human smuggling business to bolster their illegal profit margins and many illegal aliens repay the cost of their passage by carrying in backpacks filled with marijuana, cocaine, heroin and methamphetamine manufactured in makeshift Mexican labs. Illegal aliens from Africa pay the cost of their passage by swallowing dozens of conflict diamonds and other gemstones that are then retrieved by criminal gangs after their arrival. Entire networks of counterfeiters work around the clock to produce the phony birth certificates, driver’s licenses and social security cards being sold to illegal aliens in nearly every large American city. Depending on the quality of the work, these counterfeit documents are sold for as little $50 apiece for the more amateurish attempts to thousands of dollars each for very professional work that is very hard to detect.

Recent news coverage reports have exposed illegal alien prostitution rings operating in the rural areas of many states where human smugglers have lured girls as young as 14 with promises of good paying jobs in manufacturing companies and then force them into serving as prostitutes for illegal alien farmworkers. After a few days and of being sexually abused by as many as eighty different men they are either moved to a new location or set free without money or resources to fend for themselves while their pimps count up their profits and disappear back under the rocks they climbed out of until a fresh group of youngsters can be lined up and brought across the border.

There are hundreds of illegitimate contractors using low paid illegal alien workers and phony contractors license numbers to perform shoddy roof repairs, resurface asphalt driveways, and do sub-standard concrete work all over California for unsuspecting home owners who are ultimately forced to hire real professionals capable of repairing the damage done, and in most cases, the homeowners would be luckier if the crooks just took the down payment and disappeared because the cost of repairing the shoddy work they do if they actually so anything is usually higher than if the homeowner had simply hired a reputable contractor to begin with. The cost of illegal immigration to the American taxpayers is incalculable because it includes not just the crimes committed by the individual s who come here without legal authorization, it also includes the cost of the crimes by groups taking advantage of them as well as the considerable time and effort of state and federal agencies assigned to investigate and prosecute the multitude of crimes associated with illegal immigration.

Admittedly, the illegal aliens from Ireland, England, Canada and most of the European nations see far less abuse from criminal gangs than their Mexican and South American counterparts who congregate in gang ridden neigborhoods where cirinal activity is commonplace. Most of the illegal aliens from Ireland, England, Canada and most of the European nations speak English and have some degree of education or employable skill that allows them to blend into American society much easier than the uneducated, unskilled and non-English speaking illegal’s from south of the border who make up about 75% of the nation’s illegal population. Furthermore, many of the illegal aliens coming into the US from Ireland and other English speaking countries have families and friends who are American citizens and are willing to assist them by providing them with food, financing, shelter and other necessities while they work to acquire the documentation necessary to pose as American citizens. The immigration authorities have a harder time finding them and the expense to the American taxpayers for each one found and deported far exceeds the cost of finding and deporting illegal aliens from South America and Mexico. Illegal aliens from Mexico, Canada and South America can be bused home, but the rest of them must be sent home on airplanes. The additional expense incurred in their apprehension and deportation is the primary reason why the number of apprehensions and deportations are as low as they currently are, and since the majority of this nations illegal alien population originates in Mexico and South America the disparity of apprehension and deportation statistics are entirely justifiable and the credibility of allegations regarding racial profiling are entirely without merit in light of the statistical evidence. However, illegal aliens regardless of their country of origin are by definition, criminals. No illegal alien should be ignored on the basis of national origin. No effort should be wasted to apprehend and deport them to wherever they came from because every single illegal alien in this nation is a criminal, and a nation founded on the principle of respect for the law endangers the credibility of it entire structure by ineffectively enforcing laws that have been established for the protection of its citizens.

The congressional oath of office includes the obligation to protect American citizens from foreign invaders, and no matter how you look at it, 40 million illegal aliens is an invasion. The American people have quietly endured the lack of congressional accountability for too long and substantial evidence indicates that illegal immigration has played a major role in this nation’s economic problems which have adversely affected so many American families. Partisanship and the struggle for control by one political party over the other must stop, the balance of government must be restored and our elected representatives must be held strictly accountable for their failure to fulfill the obligations of their office. The abysmally low approval rating of the U.S. Congress is sufficient justification for the American people to purge that branch of government of every incumbent and replace them with representatives capable of representing the American constituencies. The argument that legislative experience is necessary is without merit. The United States Congress is loaded with representatives who have ineffectively represented the special interest groups of this nation for decades while the American people have been forced to shoulder the burden. Experience at being a corrupt politician is not what this nation needs. We need new faces, individuals with a sound sense of integrity and honesty, people who will take their oath of office seriously and dedicate themselves to representing the best interests of the American people and nothing else. Throughout the last presidential campaign Barack Obama promised change and hope. In the last nine or ten months he has delivered nothing on those promises, pushed our nation closer to the edge of economic ruin and it will take decades for American families he has pushed into poverty to recover. The one change he has accomplished has been to start the transformation of our once prosperous capitalistic free market economy into a socialist tyranny while turning the individual citizen’s freedom and liberty into untold decades of indentured servitude demanding oppressive tax burdens to repay the loans he has taken from foreign nations to artificially prop up a failing over regulated economy. I the American people want to see true change, real change, change that results in an honest corruption free government, change that results in the restoration of power by the people and for the people, change that results in the annihilation congressional abridgements eroding our constitutionally guaranteed inalienable rights, and change that unifies all American citizens instead of constantly dividing them into warring and intolerant factions, then we the citizens and legal residents of this nation must affect those changes by voting to eliminate every incompetent politician currently holding office in state and federal government and replacing them with true representatives who are willing to work effectively in our best interests or suffer the consequences of our disapproval by being ejected from office. The United States of America is the property of the American citizens and the government‘s full authority comes from us. We are not their servants and it is high time we let them know that their continued incompetence will result in their unemployment.

Technorati Tags

 illegal aliens,  Ireland, Irish,  immigration

digg this | del.icio.us

Your Chance to Speak Out Against Amnesty

Posted in Illegal Aliens & Immigration Reforms on October 28th, 2009 by MorningStar

This was forwarded to me by NumbersUSA, an organization dedicated to reducing immigration levels and encouraging the enforcement of our immigration laws. I am not a member of their organization because they do not support the use of claymores and lethal electric fences along this nation’s Southern border, and they shy away from similar strategies used by other countries to protect their borders from foreign invaders. Nonetheless, their newsletters, which are normally full of encouragement to sign petitions and send letters to politicians who could care less what the American people think, occasionally contain something of merit. NumberUSA is not a part of the group sponsoring the rallies mentioned below and I am actually surprised they mentioned it, but it is worth passing along because the U.S. Congress is growing bored with Health Care reform and may return to pushing Amnesty at any time. Short of an armed insurrection, nothing says “NO WAY” better than a few hundred thousand outraged American citizens hollering and waving signs on American street corners, and with the 2010 midterm election coming up this is a good time to remind the Democrats that not all Americans are as stupid as they would like to think.

Then again, if you don’t mind becoming a third world country, massive unemployment, and 40 million illiterate, unskilled and criminal aliens taking over your country, and draining your economy dry, you may not be interested.  It’s your choice.


————————————-

Americans for Legal Immigration PAC (ALIPAC) is spearheading an effort called Against Amnesty to promote rallies against amnesty for illegal aliens on November 14. They are seeking organizers and attendees for events in every state in the nation. As of this writing, 14 Tea Party rallies are planned and over 700 people have indicated they will participate.

If you are interested in holding your own rally on November 14, or attending one of those planned, start by visiting www.AgainstAmnesty.com and filling out a supporter form on the homepage. You can view existing event locations on the web site and easily sign up to register your own rally. The web site allows you to contact others about this effort. It also has a “Contact US” page if you have any questions.

————————————-

Technorati Tags

 illegal aliens,  amnesty,  ALIPAC,  rallies

digg this | del.icio.us

Potential Change In Format

Posted in In General on October 27th, 2009 by MorningStar

Generally speaking web blogs contain brief postings averaging from one or two paragraphs long or approximately two hundred words, to somewhat longer articles averaging around 30 short paragraphs running slightly more than 2,000 words. While there are rare instances of brief one of two paragraph postings appearing here on Fungazi, brief articles are more the exception than the norm. My last posting ran over 30,000 words, and when I created it in MS Word the entire posting was more than four pages long. Extremely long articles seem to be more the norm than the exception and I am considering the possibility of changing the format of this site to one that includes both a web blog as well as a weekly e-zine for the publication of these more extensive postings. I have not yet decided if this is necessary or whether, in fact I will actually make this change, but it is something I have been considering. The demands of creating regular postings are time consuming and there is so much going on in the world today that It is impossible to cover everything. I tend to focus on issues of personal interest and events that strike me as being particularly outrageous rather than make brief statements about a the multitude of offensive items continuously passed off as new worthy by the media. There is only so much time in a day and I can’t hit every target out there as effectively as I would like. One or two article a week in an e-zine might be a better way to go, but as I said, I haven’t decided anything at this point. Apparently the articles I write are being read because more and more individuals are registering as subscribers all the time. Obviously these people either like what they are reading, they detest my opinions so much that they feel it necessary to keep track of what I say, or they are all federal agents breathlessly waiting for me to say something that I can be prosecuted for. I have received twelve new registration notices in the last 24 hours alone. Since I first began this effort the accumulation of subscriber comments made on my postings is less than a third of the number of subscribers. I haven’t figured out the reason for this situation yet. The statistics indicate that Fungazi periodically receives a lot of traffic, and I have found references to articles that I have posted here on the web sites of U.S. Senators, Congressmen, at Opencongress.org, city-data.com and all across the spectrum of blogs related to immigration reform, amnesty, and population control (both pro & Con). These findings seem to indicate that I should leave things as they currently are, but the urge to attempt improvement is growing so don’t be surprised if you see some changes here in the next few months, if not sooner.

Regardless of any changes in format that may or may not happen, the essential content will remain the same because while my perspective on the important issues constantly evolve as event unfold before us, my sense of ethical values and my personal philosophy remains unchanged. As long as the American news media continues their effort to manipulate the minds of the American people and both the Republicans and the Democrats endeavor to destroy the inalienable rights of all human beings, I will continue to expose them to the best of my ability. Free and open debate, the quality that made this nation great, powerful and prosperous remains under siege. The forces of evil are many and I consider it a sacred obligation to wage my personal war against them. I am optimistic enough to believe that one person can make a difference and pragmatic enough to realize that no matter how many battles I lose along the way, the tyrants will inevitably fall. The desire for freedom and liberty are not philosophical concepts that sprang into existence with the formation of this nation’s original government, they are instinctual desires engraved by the one true God in the hearts and souls of everyone that has existed in the past, lives today or will be born in the future. The desire for freedom and liberty is now, and always will be an integral part of human nature. Mankind will always struggle to overcome tyranny and rid themselves of the shackles of servitude. The apathetic American people may lose their freedom and their liberty to a socialist government. Their fears may prompt them to trade freedom for safety and America may ultimately fall, but the desire for freedom and liberty will continue to exist forever and those who feel its power will once again gather and the effort to rebuild what once existed will start again. As long as I can string words together I will continue to encourage the exercise of our natural rights and expose those who would deny them. When I can no longer continue someone else will take up the effort. The appearance might change but the essence will remain the same and the one guarantee I can make it that, as long as there are those who would destroy what is good, the fight against them will continue.

Technorati Tags

 Fugazi

digg this | del.icio.us

The Union Position Versus The Truth

Posted in The Democratic Agenda on Health Care on October 26th, 2009 by MorningStar

D. Michael Langford, the current President of the national Utility Workers Union of America (UWUA) perfectly sums up the AFL-CIO stance on the entire issue of health care reform as it currently stands in relation to the Democratic National Party. In the current quarterly edition of the “The Utility Worker,” the official magazine of UWUA’s National organization, UWUA National President Langford speaking to his more than 50,000 members on the issue of health care reform made the revealing statement, “The stakes are high. If national healthcare legislation is not passed, the President and the Democratic Congress will be weakened. This will directly affect us because, as a result, we will not be able to get other key bills that we support through Congress. The Employee Free Choice Act will go down to defeat, emboldening anti-union employers and making it that much harder to bring the benefits of a union contract to others.”

Initially, when the quarterly issue of “The Utility Worker” arrives in my mailbox, I will disengage it from the stack of mail with two fingers as though it were a rag used for cleaning chamber pots in some nasty disease-ridden infectious ward Hell’s most nightmarish hospital and deposit it in the black trash receptacle; the one meant for unrecyclable items of no redeeming value, things that are not even fit for the sludgy stench filled compost bin where I throw the worm & maggot ridden husks of rotten zucchinis found in my backyard garden. If I had prior warning of its arrival I would probably adorn a Tyvek suit, rubber gloves and face mask.  Okay, maybe I am exaggerating here, exercising my weird sense of literary license, and needlessly babbling. If you so desire you may consider this entire paragraph a demonstration of mentally aberrant multi-tasking. The magazine is not that loathsome, sometimes I even read parts of it, and before the Los Angeles trash police bust down my door to check, it is always quickly discarded in the appropriate blue recycling bin. In fact, the most recent issue went into the recycling bin so quickly that I didn’t have time to clip out Langford’s most memorable comment. I had to go online to find the article because the copy sent to was hauled off last Saturday in a big truck driven by someone who probably gets his own version of the same ridiculous propaganda sent to his house by a completely different, but entirely similar labor organization spreading identical absurdities to unwary union members who really ought to stop and consider the destination that lies at the end of the path their current labor leaders have chosen for them.

MY BACKGROUND AS A RADICAL UNION OFFICER
Before going any farther down this path I must first back and explain why the quarterly Utility Worker magazine finds its way to my mailbox. The short version of the explanation is that I was a full-fledged member-in-good standing of UWUA for nearly 25 years. The broader version includes the fact that I served one of their numerous Local offices as a member of the Executive Board, the group’s financial secretary, vice president, and briefly, as the president of the local. I was also the organization’s primary communication’s officer, an active member of most of Local’s negotiating teams, the most rapacious, combative and effective union steward they ever had, and served the organization faithfully as its representative in a large number of legal proceedings, including arbitration hearings, unemployment appeals, official inquires with the Labor Departments in two different states where we represented employees and I served as the Local’s only official intervener in the permitting process hearings held by the California State Energy Commission where my primary directive was to create as much havoc and chaos possible for the union-resistant corporations trying to push their way through the complex and expensive permitting process without paying respectful homage to our Local’s attempts to organize their employees, most of whom were former members displaced during California’s electrical restructuring.

As a brief digression I should point out that California’s Electrical De-regulation, an effort that began during the mid 1990′s was a legislative charade made possible only as a result of the state’s largest utility company’s willingness to bribe, buy and blackmail the state and local elected representatives of at least 12 different states along with a good many federal representatives who were willing to look the other way if their pockets were properly lined with cash and campaign donations. At the time when the state’s deregulation bill became law, it was recorded in the news media as the single most expensive lobbying effort in the entire history of American politics. The inept legislation that was written primarily by the states three largest utility companies for their own financial gain created total chaos and confusion and resulted in massive rolling blackouts across the state in 2000 and 2001. It entirely failed to reduce the price of electricity to California consumers and made numerous electrical generation companies wealthier than they ever dreamed possible by creating a legion of loopholes and game plans they alone could manipulate to their lucrative advantage. It also resulted in the unemployment of thousands of utility company employees across the state by closing down, dismantling and selling off generating assets to out-of-state exploiters who were more than willing to hire many of those former employees at half their previous scale, no appreciable health care benefits and no union representation to muddle up the works. Ten years after the deregulation bill was passed in California the state still suffers from constantly increasing rates, periodic blackouts, and less generation capacity than they need to meet the demands of their constantly growing population. The promises made to the consumers have been long forgotten and the utility companies that bought and paid for the entire travesty deny any involvement as they use their ill-gotten windfall to purchase electrical assets in distant states, other countries and continue to sap California’s consumers for all they can.

I should also point out, by way of explanation, that I considered my personal involvement with UWUA as being the oddest of all possible relationships. As an individual I have always maintained a personal philosophy of self-reliant independence and encouraged other to do likewise. The “union” was something we, as employees, were forced to pay dues to, but in reality provided little of any real value in return. The management of the Company we worked for was uncharacteristically draconian with respect to their union represented employees. Punishments for real and imagined infractions were severe and often unwarranted, and for many years I watched silently as incompetent supervisors and management personnel beat their subordinates into submission with a strategy they referred to as “progressive discipline.” Progressive Discipline is a euphemism for harassing helpless individuals into corners where they can be emotionally and physically tortured by psychologically damaged supervisors for the sheer enjoyment of causing pain. It is a painful thing to watch. Especially when it was initiated by one or more management personnel who are completely incompetent and were promoted to positions of authority by friends and relatives who are similarly incompetent and sadistic, and their frantic victim’s panic filled eyes grow increasingly fearful with the realization that escape is impossible and ultimately their termination is inevitable. After watching this game go on before me for about ten years or so something inside me cracked. I could no longer quietly stand by and watch, and I was possessed with the determination to turn the playing field completely over. The management of the department where I was working had recently eliminated the Union Steward with a series of threats and actions that resulted in his sudden retirement and the only person who was willing to step up to the job was a blustery fat-assed moron who spent most of his time with his face buried neck deep in the backside of the nearest boss. To the great surprise of many, I decided to run against him, and during the Friday election, I won the position in a near unanimous and entirely surprising landslide. As far as the Local Union and the Company were concerned, I was a completely unknown quantity. From the time I got home that Friday until very late Sunday night, I sat before my Computer scanning and reading everything I could find about Labor Unions, labor law, the legal rights of union stewards as representatives, contract law and every document that I had in my possession concerning our particular labor organization. I learned some important and surprising things. I learned that a union steward while in the performance of the obligations of his or her office is considered by state and federal law as being on equal footing with any management person that steward is dealing with, furthermore, I learned that there are ways to force the officers of the local to support the actions of a steward so long as those actions are consistent with the local union’s constitution and working agreement. The situation I had voluntarily thrown myself into was one that I knew this information would prove vital. The first thing on the Monday morning following my election I was approached by my immediate supervisor and told to report to the manager’s office. I went there and knocked on the closed door, heard the summons to enter and walked in to find myself facing not only the manager himself but his entire complement of most trusted management thugs. With every eye fixed on me with extreme malice I was directed to a take my place in a chair that had been strategically placed by itself directly across from where they sat. I walked to the chair, their idea of the “Hot Seat,” picked it up and moved it directly in front of them so I could sit toe to toe with the entire crowd, and before they could say anything at all to me I calmly announced to the assemblage that it was now a new day and things were going to change forever after. Despite the snorts of outrage and attempted interruptions I spoke over them as I firmly stated that from this point forward I was the duly elected representative of the their employees as provided under the labor agreement they, as management were obligated to honor and that my expectation was that all employees would be treated with courtesy and respect by their supervisors and that each of them would be afforded their full rights under the provisions of the union agreement and under the applicable provisions of state and federal law. I concluded my brief statement with the fact that I would hold everyone of them accountable for their actions, that I would prosecute to the fullest extent and the best of my ability every infraction of the contractual provisions, that I would not hesitate to use any available resource within the company or through state and federal departments to protect the employees that had voted for me and to enforce the provisions of the union contract. I got up turned around, picked up the chair carried it across the room and set it in it’s original position, walked out of the room and closed the door behind me and throughout the entire five minute period introduction, not one of them completed a full sentence and they sat in stunned silence as I left the office and returned to my job site where I did some deep breathing to settle my mind around the events that had just taken place. Amazingly enough, the remainder of the day passed without comment from anyone in management as I quietly went about my job as usual. The following day I was summoned into the office and told to report to the Union office for new steward training. Not a problem. I closed up my toolbox, hopped into my truck and drove over to the union office about ten miles from the shop where I worked. I was somewhat surprised to discover that I was the only new steward being trained and I suspect that it was quietly arranged the following Friday by a manager who wanted me to be bound, gagged, and drown in the nearest river as soon as possible and certainly before I could start any problems. Having been in this Local for about ten years I already knew that most of the officers were not worth a tinker’s damn and expected the worse. As it turned out, the training was conducted by the newly elected Vice-President of the local. His campaign for office was not supported by the Business Manager who considered him to be far too radical and the training he gave me that day, while brief, encouraged rather than discouraged my intended goal. I maintained my position as the chief steward for that facility until I transferred to another department. My primary operational philosophy was that the Union existed solely to serve the needs of the members. The members were the first priority, the Local was second and as far as the National Organization was considered, I could care less. On numerous occasions I would contradict the National’s political recommendations and when I was given pamphlets or circulars to hand out from the National Office regarding their recommendations during federal elections they normally ended up in the trash. Despite being a wild card, I prospered as a steward because I was persistent and willing to work 24 hours a day, seven days a week to get something accomplished. I dedicated a lot of my time in that shop to organizing the represented employees into a solid, cohesive force, and despite the contractual provision prohibiting the solicitation of grievances by stewards, I routinely badgered the members into joining the fight for our common good. I adopted the management strategy of progressive discipline and used it against the supervisors. Their first violation of the union contract earned them a grievance, their second violation earned them four or five grievances, if they continued to harass and abuse their subordinates I would normally approach them in private, discuss my perception of their inappropriate behavior and let them know in clear and specific terms that I was more than willing to dedicating the rest of my life making them as completely miserable as I possibly could. Most of them had never dealt with a steward who was capable of standing up to them and 96% of them fell into line to the best of their ability. Every time I filed a grievance, the supervisor who received it had the obligation of responding to it in writing. These were not overly intelligent people and it took a lot of their time to respond. The more grievances I filled the more time it took for them to respond and the less we had to see of them. As for the 4% who refused to fall into line, I inundated them in grievances, sometimes hundreds of them all served at once. Our contract had a three step grievance process and I advanced every grievance where the response did not meet my expectations to the second step so I could debate the issue at hand with the supervisor’s boss. Economically, the continually escalating war with management became an obvious drain on their budget and everyone in management had to spend all of their time writing responses to the grievances I had filed. After about a year of unrelenting siege warfare they caved in. During the first three or four years as the chief steward for that shop I managed to get one general foreman and a new manager terminated from the company and I got three supervisors reassigned to jobs in other areas of the company. The supervisors learned to come to me before approaching a represented employee about a problem. I would do what I could to straighten the situation out, resolve the issue and get the guy back on track. Usually this was a very successful strategy. If I met with resistance, or the employee continued his errant ways, I would get approach them in a more forceful manner, explain that their job was in jeopardy and immediate changes were required. It usually worked well. On the few occasions where it didn’t work I would go back to the guy’s supervisor and tell him the truth. A slacker hurts everyone else and the Union Contract worked both ways, the represented employees agreed to abide by specific rules laid out in the agreement and the company agreed to pay them a specific wage and provide them with excellent benefits in exchange for their compliance. Union members who violated the agreement damaged the credibility of the entire membership and if I couldn’t get them to change their ways I was willing to personally throw them to the wolves myself. In any business or endeavor, credibility means everything and if you lose it you lose everything. I viewed my job as a steward as an obligation to enforce the union contract, the side that provided protection, compensation and benefit to the represented membership as well as the side that required compliance with the Company’s rules and guidelines. Needless to say, I made a lot of friends and enemies on both sides but I maintained my credibility and advanced through the leadership positions in the Local to become President.

Along the lengthy path to becoming the president of that Local I learned quite a few things about the Labor Movement, Labor Organizations and their numerous affiliations, labor strategy and the development of organized labor’s agendas that I did not agree with. At first I did my best to ignore most of these objectionable practices but ultimately the accumulation of dishonesty that pervades organized labor as a whole undermined my perception of organized labor as a credible and worthwhile cause. The practice of forcing non-members or “Agency Members” to pay dues while the organization treated them as if they were scabs is something I can never condone. The fact that Agency Members are legally entitled to reimbursement for all dues not used to directly benefit them is something they are not advised of and most Local unions force the Agency members to jump through impossible hoops before their “representative” relinquishes only the minimal percentage they determine appropriate. The formation of Union political action committees and the solicitation of funds for what amounts to outright bribery of public officials is another thing that I find completely distasteful. PACS undermine the honest operation of government by currying favor with elected representatives. Most Local union spend in excess of 85% of their yearly dues collection on the bribery of public officials, additionally, every local sends a portion of its monthly dues to the Nation organization to pay the wages and expenses of moronic labor leaders like the character mentioned in the first paragraph of this posting, and a good portion of the money left over is used to bribe the elected representatives in Washington. 99.9% of the member’s dues money used to curry favor with politicians goes directly to the Democratic national Party and its candidates despite the fact that more than 40% of the Union members in this country are registered Republicans or Independents. The spending of a Local’s PAC money is not determined by the membership who fills their treasury. It is determined by the Local leadership and the National officers. The rank and file members have no say in the matter regardless of their personal political affiliation and 40% of them are forced to pay support to candidates they would never vote for. The National labor organizations know all the tricks and loopholes in the system and they are extremely proficient at getting the money to the politician by one means or another. The AFL-CIO and its affiliate unions are the single largest money laundering system in the United States today and the sole purpose for their existence is to funnel their accumulation of member’s dues money into the Democratic National Party to fund campaigns for Democratic candidates and finance advertising campaigns supporting legislation that will ultimately affect the members of those labor groups in a variety of adverse ways. In 2001 I formally challenged the Local for the dishonesty of many of its top officers. I realized at the time that it would be the end of my union career but I did it anyway because it was the right and honest thing to do. The charges I filed were investigated by a committee made up of individuals selected by those I had charged with improprieties and quite naturally they ascertained that my charges were without merit. I remained in office for the remainder of my term despite the organized effort to destroy my character and undermine everything I had accomplished. When I appealed to the National for assistance, I was faced with massive amounts of entirely fabricated documentation regarding numerous unfounded allegations. Despite proving each of them to be without substance, the National refused to assist me. The final straw came a few months after I left office when the Executive Board voted unanimously to drop a termination grievance against a member who was irrefutably not guilty of the charge against him. At that point I became an Agency fee member of the same Local I had served for so many years and much to their dismay, I continued to send out weekly letters to the union membership enlightening them in well substantiated detail how they were being shafted by a group that was unwilling to represent them according to the agreements that remained in effect. During the last two years of my employment, prior to my retirement as an agency member, the number of members in that Local dropped from 2300 to around 840. Unfortunately, after witnessing the character assassination of a former President of the Local, there was nobody left in that Local with the stamina and tenacity to fight the leadership and at this point in time what remains is a toothless ineffective operation led by a few self-serving clods who spend the majority of their time pillaging the Local’s treasury with padded expenses while investing their ill-gotten money in business ventures in Baja-California where they hope the IRS will never look. I am not bitter about the way things ended for me, I didn’t like what I saw going on, spoke out against it and got tarred a feathered for my efforts. Realistically it was the best thing that had happened to me in years because it gave me the freedom to speak out without being subject to the Local’s disciplinary process. As an agency fee member the union couldn’t touch me. The leadership that came after were all idiots, and not only are they still there, but they are still idiots. Eventually, if their own member’s don’t turn on them first, the company their members work for will squash them like the bugs they are.

Labor Organizing & The Transformation of Labor Philosophy

UWUA President Langford’s statement is hardly an endorsement for Obamacare. He is smart enough and has intelligent advisors who have undoubtedly told him that the passage of the Democrat’s health care reform measure will result in lower quality care and higher taxes for his membership. Despite the fact that he knows this is true, he is willing to tell his members that they must see this bill pass, not because it is a good thing or that it will benefit them in some small way but because if it doesn’t pass it could weaken the Democratic Party and destroy their ability to get the Employee Free Choice Act passed later. The AFL-CIO desperately wants the Employee Free Choice Act to pass because it will give them the upper hand necessary to force companies to allow union organizers to intimidate their employees into joining unions they don’t want to join. It destroys the secret ballot requirement that has effectively allowed employees to resist union intimidation for the last fifty years and without those secret ballot elections the Unions can steamroll companies easily by sending their best, biggest and most slow-witted organizers out to pound on the doors of prospective members while they are at home with their families and extract the necessary signature from them by threat, harassment and intimidation. Every Local will deny that they resort to these tactics but that is a bald-faced lie. I have seen it myself and I know that these strategies are routinely employed by most locals during organizing campaigns. UWUA used these strategies against the employees of Redondo Beach Generating Station during their failed attempt to organize that facility after it was sold to the anti-union company AES. The employees most resistant to their efforts received a late nigh visit from a group of organizers that included one bearded character that was nearly seven feet tall, weighed in around 400 pounds and was previously employed as a bar room bouncer in one of the shadier nightclubs of Laughlin, Nevada. The locals ability to get their cards signed was uncanny, nearly every AES employee approached signed whether they wanted to or not but during the secret ballot election overseen by the National Labor Relations Board, those employees voted overwhelmingly to reject the union. It wasn’t the closed door meeting with management that convinced them to vote against union representation. The dishonest approach of the organizers was sufficient to convince them that any affiliation with an organization that would stoop to those strategies was not going to be beneficial. The AFL-CIO sees those secret ballot elections as an impediment to their ability to gain more money for the Democratic National party and that is the reason why the Democrats and the Unions support it. It has nothing to do with what is best for American workers, its all about more money for the Democrats and more political power for the Unions. UWUA President Langford doesn’t give a rat’s ass about how the Democrat’s health care reform measure creates unwarranted hardship on his own members, he doesn’t care about the fact that it will raise their taxes, provide them with lower quality health care and restrict their access to medical procedures that are necessary to save the lives of their wives and children, he doesn’t care about any of these things because he wants the Democratic National Party to remain powerful enough to pass the Employee Free Choice Act that they promised the Unions they would pass when those unions turned over untold and untraceable billions of dues dollars during the last presidential election. The employee free choice act is nothing more than the Democrat’s way of saying thanks for the billions of dollars you gave us. It will increase the political power of the labor unions and ensure the steady supply of dues money flowing endlessly into the coffers of the DNC for years to come. As for the American workers, the employee free choice act will destroy the long standing practice of providing them with an unimpeded Democratic election, it will take away their right to express their true desire with respect to union representation in the privacy of a balloting booth and it will encourage union organizers to become even more aggressive in their use of intimidation and harassment of targeted employees resistant to labor representation.

The current leaders of today’s Labor Movement are less concerned with the welfare of the workers they represent than they are in increasing their membership which directly translates into more income for them and more money to invest in enlarging their political power. Their bottom line, a favorite phrase employed by most union leaders, is that the potential for increasing union membership, no matter how remote that potential might be, is worth the sacrifice of their current membership, their current member’s rights and any adversity, great or small, that their current members must endure, while they collectively chase that bird in the bush disregarding entirely the bird in their hand.

One classic example is the popular Democratic issue of immigration reform and amnesty. The national average unemployment rate is now approaching 9%. Its tough to estimate because the Democratic administration ordered the Department of Labor to quit counting the people who have exhausted their employment resources and given up hope of finding a job, the actual number may be 10% or 15% but nobody really knows because the figure are being skewed purposely to provide the illusion of economic recovery that simply is not possible when we owe the world more than 9 trillion dollars that we have no way to pay back. But back to the example – Illegal immigration reform and amnesty at a point in time when unemployment in this country is rampant, companies are going belly up all over the place and American workers are losing their homes is sheer insanity. American corporations and government agencies like FEMA are hiring contractors whose employees are 95% illegal aliens while American citizens, many of whom are members of Carpenter’s unions, IBEW, Lath & Plasterer’s unions and the entire spectrum of union represented construction occupations, are sitting at home drawing unemployment checks waiting for the bank to foreclose on their homes and yet their Union leaders at the local, national and international level stand united in support of illegal alien’s rights and amnesty for the future cheap labor replacements of their own members. Furthermore, the dues money paid into the treasuries of the assorted Building Trades Unions is being funneled into the Democratic Party’s push for amnesty. Some union leaders would argue that the September edict of Obama’s Office of Management and Budget that bans non-union workers from all federal construction projects over $25 million is a good indication that the allegation I am making here is false. However, what they aren’t telling you is that 99% of the construction work being done by the federal government is being bid out on a piecemeal basis. Most of the large projects have been broken up into small pieces and each piece goes out for a separate bid to the lowest bidder capable of doing the job, union or not. The federal ban on non-union workers on federal construction projects over $25 million has a hole in it that is ten miles wide and the entire thing is nothing more than lip service for union leaders to carry back to their locals and say “See what we got with your hard earned dollars,” and if those jerk offs had an ounce of honesty anywhere in their bodies they would be holding up a giant greased up rubber dildo while they told their members what the Obama administration had in store for their future. Furthermore, since union members only make up about 15% of the American population this edict leaves the rest of the American population out in the cold and any labor organization that would sacrifice American workers in favor of illegal aliens who might become union members at some point isn’t worth a tinkers damn even if the union leaders consider it a fine idea.

What sort of country do the rank and file union members want to raise their families in? Are they willing to sacrifice their fellow citizens and ultimately their constitutional own rights just so their leadership can gain political power off the backs of treasonous politicians? In the past ten years labor unions have dumped billions of their member’s dues money into the Democratic Party and what do these members have to show for it? The Democrats have promised them everything under the sun but what have they actually delivered and is it worth what it cost? The only people who are reaping any real benefit in this outrageous game are the labor leaders. The wages and benefits of the union members aren’t going up that fast, your health care benefits are costing you more every year and nothing going on in Washington DC is going to make your situation any better than it is right now. The Democrats health care reform bill is written to benefit the insurance companies who wrote it. There is nothing in that guarantees lower prices to anyone and it is not going to alter any negotiated benefit plan between a company and a union. Next year you will pay even more for less than what you get today and even if it passes there is no guarantee that the employee free choice act is going to pass regardless of what jackasses like Langford have to say on the matter. With the money that UWUA collects from its members every month the National could afford to pay every members portion of their health care benefits and still have plenty left over to do whatever the heck it is they do in their Washington D.C. office when they’re not busy stabbing each other in the back.

If labor unions are going to lobby in Washington then they should lobby for things that will benefit their members instead of cause them more problems. They should support the use of E-Verify, they should push for legislation that makes it a felony to knowingly hire an illegal alien, they should propose legislation that would make it a crime to solicit illegal alien day laborers, and they should work to get every form of social welfare denied to illegal aliens and deny education opportunities to illegal aliens. All of these things would benefit union members by making good jobs available for American citizens, making educational opportunities available for the children of union members and allow union members to raise their families in an environment that was not infested by illegal alien street gangs and sexual predators, however, there is no labor union in this nation, including UWUA, that is doing any of these things and the simple truth is that they aren’t doing them because they don’t care about their members or their country. The only thing they care about is political power and they are using your money to buy it leaving you, your spouse and your children to suffer the consequences.

The sole purpose for any labor union’s existence is to protect and benefit its membership. That is the bottom line. How is your union providing you protection and benefit by destroying your nation and supporting socialism? If Obama can cut the wages of a company’s CEO what is to stop him from cutting the wages for electricians, carpenters, masonry workers and plumbers? If you don’t like where your labor union is spending your dues money you have a legal right to object and demand reimbursement for all money spent on political campaigns that you don’t agree with. You cannot be forced to support dishonest politicians who are destroying our nation. The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to remain silent. I’ve been there and seen it from one end to the other. I had the benefit of experience as a rank and file member, I have represented more union members in grievance meetings than I can remember, I’ve negotiated agreements, contracts and benefits for the union members of multiple companies, I’ve represented the interests of UWUA in hearings, arbitrations and court cases, and I have sat in Langford’s office back when Wightman was the top dog, so I know exactly what I am talking about here. The leadership of UWUA and every other labor organization in this country are lying through their teeth to their members because they know that you are too busy working your ass off to find out the truth, and when you have finished digging the hole they’ve conned you into digging for them, they will push you in hire illegal aliens to cover it up. Just because some wise guy sports a five hundred dollar haircut and a three thousand dollar suit none it increases his credibility so you need to start thinking independently and critically about what you are being told.

The only thing dumber than getting screwed repeatedly is paying monthly for the privilege of getting screwed repeatedly.

—————————————————————-

AFTERNOTE: This posting is the one exception to my long standing promise to post all replies. I will accept comments, but anything coming in from mindless union freaks with an axe to grind might not get published unless I find them particularly entertaining. As ususal all intellegent debate is welcome, less than intellegent debate is acceptable as well, and all comments are held for review by the author and owner of this site.

Technorati Tags

 health care,  healthcare reform,  AFL-CIO,  UWUA,  labor union

digg this | del.icio.us

SOUPY SALES – PATRON SAINT OF SPONTANEOUS ERUPTIONS OF COMPLETELY INAPPROPRIATE HILARITY IN DIRE TIMES

Posted in An American Revolution on October 23rd, 2009 by MorningStar

I remember when I was in junior high school, I had conned and cajoled my way out of a kid’s judo class and into an adults Ju-jitsu class where neither the serious Japanese sensei nor the equally serious adult students cut me any slack at all. I spent most of my first two years being kicked, choked and bodily thrown from one end of the dojo to the other by my instructor and fellow students in their many futile attempts to convince me of the error of premature advancement. At the conclusion of each Tuesday and Thursday lesson, bruised, beaten, bleeding and sweating like a pig going through menopause, I would scamper out of that building and run like the dickens to my parent’s house about a mile and a half through the crime-ridden streets of Compton where my two older brothers would be laughing their ugly butts off watching Soupy Sales on our ancient 800 pound maple paneled television set. The Soupy Sales Show started at the same instant that our entire class lined up for the final bow before our diminutive, but dangerous instructor. With rare exception, I made that run in less than eight minutes. Normally, I would drag my beaten ass through the front door five or six minutes before the mid-show commercial break and sit for a full fifteen or twenty minutes in the glow of that massive glowing screen, panting, sweating and laughing my fool head off at the silly antics of the only television show that I considered worth watching during my short lived youth. The stupid jokes, the bodiless puppets White Fang and Black Tooth, endless pie throwing and insane peels of laughter pouring from my mouth and the mouths of my two older brothers (sadistical bastards, the both of them) always seemed to erase the pain of my multiple injuries and over-stretched muscles. It leeched the soreness from my bones, faded my bruises, and eradicated the painful memories of that day’s tortures inflicted by much older and larger men who were unanimous in their contempt for my presence. Nearly forty-eight years after the fact, I can look back at those days with the clarity of hindsight and understand that the television history’s most silly comedian somehow made each days suffering much easier to take. I continued those classes, swallowed each painful lesson with joy as it came to me, and eventfully I began to learn. Those classes lasted about as long as Soupy’s show. Despite the pain I suffered throughout, I stoically persevered, and by the time the city park’s department cut them from its budget, and the Soupy Sales Show was replaced by some mind numbing show about teenage hippies turned cops, I was dishing out more pain and humiliation to my older classmates than they were inflicting on me and I had even managed to earn the reluctant respect of the almond-eyed gentleman before we last bowed to one another and our paths parted forever. Persistence is one characteristic I seem to have in abundance and it has usually served me well.

This morning’s news paper brought a strange sense of loss to me with the news that the great Soupy Sales has died at the age of 86 years. The news of his death brought a flood of memories racing back through my mind.

The early 1960s when “The Soupy Sales Show” first appeared on our limited local television stations were such a strange period in time. America was launching rocket ships into space and talking about going to the moon, Adolf Eichmann, a long missing Nazi war criminal was snatched out of South America and hung by his scrawny neck in Israel. Marilyn Monroe died from an overdose of drugs, booze and life, Spider-Man appeared out of nowhere and I learned the hard way about the questionable strength of thin fiber ropes as I fell from the gigantic elm tree in our front yard. The stand-off between the United States and the Soviet Union near the island of Cuba threatened the world with nuclear war and struck real fear into the hearts and minds of everyone. I remember the tears that welled up in the fearful eyes of my junior high-school classmates as this situation was discussed in our history classes and American kids all across this nation believed that a nuclear war was unavoidable and Armageddon was upon us. An English pop group called the “Beatles” began to dominate the local radio shows and I hated their music, but I fell held over heels in unrequited love with the daughter of a Mormon Bishop, a comely lass who refused to acknowledge my existence till I eventually wore her down two years later. Buddhist monks began setting fire to themselves in a distant country called Vietnam, and an amazing train robbery in England raises strange personal feelings of deep admiration for the ingenious thieves. Little transistor radios and electronic calculators the size of a paper-back book were being sold in a new store called Sav-On’s for over a fifty bucks each. The Civil Rights movement in the U.S. gained ground and I realized for the first time in my life that, unlike the dominant population of my hometown, I was a white boy. On one sunny day in November our fifth-period classes were interrupted with an intercom announcement by the school principal that President Kennedy was shot and killed in Dallas, Texas, and later, as I sat on the cinder block wall outside the school where nobody could see me, I softly cried for the death of the first American president that I had actually seen with my own eyes; rooted for during the Democratic Convention held in Los Angeles, and admired for his brave actions during World War II, his personal integrity as America’s 35th President, and the pain his family must have felt at the time of his death.

Amidst those strange, sad and amazing times, as our nation grew closer and closer to becoming more deeply involved in the politics of South-East Asia and I lost my virginity to Rudi Stolt’s beautiful red-headed sister in the privacy afforded by her family’s backyard bomb shelter, and all through this strange period of time I was getting my butt kicked twice weekly by an odd assortment of adults, twice my size and three times my age, while Soupy Sales remained a constant and never-ending source of hilarity.

Soupy died at 86 years of age; he had experienced a decent, if short, television career, brought about gales of laughter across the entire nation, and permanently inspired a legion of impressionable youth to take few things seriously and laugh easily at anything that struck us as being even remotely funny. Singlehandedly, he seriously retarded an entire generation’s ability to pay respectful homage to the matter of fact concepts expressed by our parents, and whether, he knew it or not, intentionally or unintentionally, that one extremely funny character instilled a solid sense of humor in millions of American kids at a point in American history where humor was desperately needed and universally despised by the rapidly dwindling horde of parental Puritans wringing their hands in anxiety over the future of a nation run by obvious idiots with a demonstrated propensity for food fights in school cafeterias, shouting aah-raw, aah-raw, as they flung mashed potatoes and cod cakes in every direction. Soupy Sales was more than a television comedian, he was an inspiration and a devastating force of nature whose delightfully silly antics inspired countless acts of entirely surprising, spontaneous insanity among normally well-behaved American children. It was a change that was as much needed as it was hated by our elders. Soupy Sales did the world a favor, and if there was any true justice, the transformation he wrought would be acknowledged as being a true, honest to God miracle from beyond the veil of possibility, considering the dire nature of entirely devastating and threatening events going on everywhere during those times, and the man would be canonized as a true saint. Saint Soupy, the patron saint of spontaneous eruptions of completely inappropriate hilarity in dire times.

Alas, Soupy Sales is now dead, and I am sorry to see him gone, because if there was ever a time when laughter was most needed, it is now. One look across the spectrum of this nation’s diverse populace supplies ample reason to justify the belief that, as a group, America’s sense of humor has become seriously hindered. The corrupt shenanigans of Washington DC’s professional politicians have sapped our sense of humor with the efficiency of ravenous vampires draining the blood from some innocent late night victim. The dour faces we pass everyday in our wanderings have a serious set to them and the feeling of anxiety is thick enough to slice and substantial enough to butter. Political manipulators using carefully collected data and clever computer programs have developed and fine tuned their ability to calculate and predict everything we think and every action we will take. The smug arrogance they so publicly exhibit is the result knowing that our actions are entirely predictable, our every move tracked and tabulated and all future action is fully expected by those who push the buttons, pull the strings and are never surprised by the expected results they always get. Like autonomons, the ancient mechanistic forerunners of today’s robots, our controllers have complete faith in their ability to push button “F” for an expected result and pull string # 252 for the installation of tomorrow’s new found fear. The predictability of our behavior has given them the power to control and has destroyed the true essence of human liberty we once enjoyed. The American populace needs a huge dose of Saint Soupy’s spontaneity to resist the gravitational pull towards complete predictability and enslavement. Spontaneity is the virus of all government systems of predictive analysis. Spontaneity breeds chaos, and chaos is a self-replicating creature in any orderly system characterized by the effort to establish predictability. Soupy Sales, when we need him the most is dead and soon to be buried. There is no Spider-Man coming to save us all from the evil minions of the scowling faced power mongers pushing our buttons and pulling our strings, but buried deep within the internal confines of some individuals there rests a powerful force that can save the planet from the eternal doldrums of world domination by self-serving bores and authoritarian sour-pusses. Those individuals must invoke the power of Saint Soupy, discover their hidden funny bone, and wreck havoc on predictability by unleashing their natural ability to spread the infection of spontaneously inappropriate hilarity everywhere. Spontaneously inappropriate hilarity is the deadliest weapon ever devised in the fight against tyranny. Spontaneity is the embodiment of true liberty and hilarity is the best vaccination against Socialism ever devised.

Release the Whoopi cushions of chaos and destroy the authoritarian mudshark’s administration with weapons of mass hilarity.



Technorati Tags

 Soupy Sales

digg this | del.icio.us

THE TRUTH ABOUT HEALTH CARE REFORM

Posted in The Democratic Agenda on Health Care on October 22nd, 2009 by MorningStar

The Honorable Michael J. Rogers, U.S. House of Representatives from Michigan’s 8th district says more about the current Democrat’s health care plan than anyone in the American media is willing to tell you. You owe it to yourself to find out what this man has to say and to understand it because he is telling the absolute truth about a piece of legislation that has been written for the benefit of the big insurance companies and health care providers and guarantees the American people higher taxes, lower quality care, and gives no assurance of lower prices, or the coverage you need if disaster strikes and you become very ill. All Republicans are not equal, some are little better than the lying Democrats who are trying to shove this garbage down our throats, however, Mike Rogers is telling the truth in this video and his words need to be heard.

Technorati Tags

 Mike Rogers,  health care

digg this | del.icio.us

Observations From Different Places

Posted in In General on October 19th, 2009 by MorningStar

As I stated earlier last week I just dragged in from two weeks of “Vacation” and I’ve spent the last couple of days trying to recover from walking 400 miles through New York, 200 miles through Washington D.C., snaking through some woods in South Carolina, stumbling around Charleston for a few hours and then spending four days wandering up and down the streets of New Orleans. During the entire two week period approximately 5 hours of it was spent behind the wheel of a car and most of that during the drive from Lamar, South Carolina to Charleston, South Carolina. As it turned out that rental car cost me more than a plane ticket from Los Angeles to New York City. In case you haven’t noticed airline tickets are cheap these days. It costs less to fly from LAX to JFK than it would to take a bus. The train we rode from New York to Washington D.C. cost nearly as much as the flight to New York. Initially our plan was to drive the whole thing because there is a lot of interesting stuff to see on the way but when we found out that flying was cheaper we figured we could fly one way and drive a rental car back. This was a bad idea we scrapped as soon as we discovered that the drop off price in Los Angeles for a rental car from New York was $2000 and that didn’t even include the cost of the rental or the mileage charges or the massive tax they tack on just to piss you off. I decided that seeing the world’s largest cross, the Route 66 museum and stopping in a few souvenir stands along the way wasn’t worth the cost. Once we decided to fly both ways we discovered we had a lot of extra time and that’s when we figured we may as well spend that extra time visiting the most humid and miserable place anyone could ever visit in the summer, so we booked a flight to New Orleans. We got rained on in New York, Washington D.C., South Carolina and despite the heat we even got drenched in New Orleans, but all things considered, we had a great time.

New York City is a great place to visit. You can get anywhere you want to go and some places you didn’t intend to be just by hoping on a subway. You can get a seven day pass for about $27 that lets you ride any subway in town as many times as you want. It’s probably the best value available in the entire country. Everybody in New York rides the subway, rich people, and poor people, working people, bums, school kids, crazy panhandlers and tourists with enough sense to leave their cars at home. About 90% of the cars on the streets of New York are taxi cabs. You can stand on any corner and watch a constant stream of taxi cabs speeding around, all honking and yelling at each other in 80 different languages. Television has given New York City a bum rap. I’m sure it’s got some funky neighborhoods but the streets cleaner than they are in Los Angeles and we walked through Central Park after midnight without getting mugged. I didn’t see one rat or cockroach the whole time I was there. The people are friendly, especially to lost and clueless tourists, and if you’re into shopping you can find stores in New York that sell everything you can imagine at prices way below what we’re used to seeing in Southern California. The city is dripping with fine old buildings, great architecture, museums and history and you don’t need a car to get to anything as long as you’re willing to cram yourself into a subway car that’s already packed full of people and hang on to a pole till you get to your destination. I think the subways play an integral part in the psychology of New York City’s population. To get anywhere they eventually have to ride it and everybody is crammed in together regardless of their station in life, the color of their skin or their national origin. Every car contains a cross-section of the entire city and nobody seems to get their hackles up as those subway cars lurch around and people are tripping over each other or falling in their laps. You could slide into one of those things dressed like Bozo the Clown with a giant rubber dildo sewn to the front of your pants and nobody would even look at you, let alone say anything.

Washington D.C. has changed a lot since I was there about ten years ago. I think a lot of it is because of 9-11 but that doesn’t account for everything. I don’t think they are as afraid of Islamic terrorists as much as they afraid of the American people. Homeland Security is everywhere. They rush up and down the streets in their white vans like something is about to explode somewhere and in many parts of the city you can see groups of them on roof tops looking through spotter scopes for potential right-wing extremists and soccer moms with anti-Obama bumper stickers. I don’t know what they did with all the homeless, the panhandlers and the junkies that were wandering around that town ten years ago but they aren’t there anymore. I think the Democrats must have rounded them all up and got them elected to office. D.C. has a subway system as well but we didn’t ride it. We walked from the hotel to the Capital building and then down to the Lincoln Memorial, took in the gaggle of war memorials and a two of the Smithsonian museums but by the time we made it to the Air & Space Museum it was closed and our feet were sore and we were tired of walking so we caught a ride in a pedi-cab back towards our hotel, had dinner and crashed early because we had to catch our plane to South Carolina the next morning.

________________________________________________________

In Charleston we took a ferry out to Fort Sumter where the first shots were fired during the Civil War. In New York and Washington D.C. the memorials are for the Union Army Generals, but in Charleston and New Orleans the Memorials are for the Confederate Generals and soldiers who served the Confederacy. The story behind Fort Sumter is amazing.

South Carolina declared its secession from the Union on December 20, 1860, five days later U.S. Army Major Robert Anderson spiked the cannons at nearby Fort Moultrie, abandoned what he considered to be an indefensible fortification and under the cover of darkness secretly relocated his two companies of the 1st U.S. Artillery Regiment to Fort Sumter. At 4:30 am on April 12, 1861 a single mortar round fired from Fort Johnson exploded over Fort Sumter but they did not begin their bombardment of the island fort until 7:00 am when Capt. Abner Doubleday fired a shot at the Ironclad Battery at Cummings Point whereupon the Confederates opened fire from their 43 guns and mortars at Fort Moultrie, the Floating Battery of Charleston Harbor and Cummings Point. Fort Sumter fort had been designed to hold out against a naval assault at a time when naval warships carry guns capable of elevating high enough to fire over the walls of the fort, however, the land based artillery manned by the South Carolina militia were capable of lobbing round after round directly over the walls into the fort, thereby limiting Major Anderson’s use of the Sumter’s upper levels and restricting him to the lowest levels where the cannons suffered a limited field of fire. The Confederate troops fired some 3000 rounds into Fort Sumter over a period of around 34 hours, and after one of their rounds took down the flag pole envoys were dispatched to the island to see if they were ready to surrender. Major Anderson agreed to surrender providing he be allowed to re-raise the flag and lower it with a 100 gun salute. The Confederates acquiesced to his terms, the flag was raised and when the 47th gun fired a spark ignited several nearby cartridges killing one soldier instantly and seriously injuring the rest of the gun crew. The salute was halted after fifty rounds were fired and the surrendering Union troops were placed aboard a Confederate steamer where they spent the night and were transferred to the Union steamer Baltic resting outside the harbor sand bar the following day. The injured gun crew was taken to a Charleston hospital where one later died from his wounds and the remaining soldiers were sent back to the North. The two men killed by the accidental explosion were the only casualties in the opening battle between the states.

An 1861 engraving shows the nearly completed Fort Sumter as was constructed on a man-made island of sea shells and granite from northern quarries. The fort’s strategic location in the center of Charleston’s harbor provided the Confederacy with a near perfect location for ships carrying much needed supplies to run through the Union blockades. The fort itself is a pentagonal structure; originally it’s walls were fifty feet high and eight to twelve feet thick. The first Union attempt to regain control of Charleston harbor began on April 7, 1863 when Rear Admiral Samuel Francis Du Pont, commander of the South Atlantic Blockading Squadron, moved the ironclad frigate New Ironsides, the tower ironclad Keokuk, and the monitors Weehawken, Passaic. Montauk, Patapsco, Nantucket, Catskill, and Nahant into firing range of Charleston’s Confederate controlled coastal defenses. The Union fleet of ironclad ships never managed to effectively engage and the 154 rounds they fired were answered by more than 2,209 rounds fired by the Confederate defenders. The ironclad Keokuk sustained so much damage during this battle that it sank the following day a little more than one mile off the southern tip of nearby Morris Island and two of the ship’s massive 11 inch Dahlgren guns were salvaged by the the Confederacy who moved one of them into Fort Sumter where it was put to use defending the fort against further attacks by Union forces. On the night of February 17, 1864 eight ill-fated, but courageous crewmen manning the 40 foot long Confederate States Ship H. L. Hunley were killed following the first successful submarine attack sinking the 1124 metric ton USS Housatonic in Charleston harbor. While the Hunley survived the attack, she foundered and sank while returning from her mission and the wreckage of the Confederate submarine was not recovered until April 17, 2004. The eight Hunley crewmen who drowned inside the primitive submarine were interred in Charleston’s Magnolia Cemetery with full military honors.

A particularly devastating bombardment by Union forces between August 16th and the 23rd of 1863, Union batteries with vastly improved artillery pieces continued their bombardment of Fort Sumter firing more than 5000 projectiles at the rapidly diminishing fort and successfully dismounting all of the parapet guns. The Confederate soldiers worked tirelessly to salvage the remaining undamaged cannons from the ruins and managed to get four 10 inch columbiads, a single 8-inch rifled columbiad, and two rifled 42-pounders all of which were mounted in the left face, bottom tier casemates of what remained of the devastated fort despite further bombardment by the Union batteries aimed at hindering the repairs. With the loss of their most effective artillery pieces and the fort in ruins the tenacious Confederates manned the ruins of the island fort with capable infantry forces.

The Union Generals no longer considered Fort Sumter an effective part of Charleston harbor’s defense and this bit of delusional thinking led General Quincy A. Gillmore and Rear Admiral John A. Dahlgren, now commanding the South Atlantic Blockading Squadron, to the determination that they could easily take Fort Sumter down with a combined land and sea assault during the first weeks of September, 1863. However, Gillmore and Dahlgren both seriously underestimated the strength and tenacity of the Confederate defenders, and the uncoordinated attack was a fiasco from start to finish.

Admiral Dahlgren, apparently a stubborn gentleman who desired full credit for taking Fort Sumter, estimated the Confederate strength on Fort Sumter to be at most, limited to 6 to 10 men remaining from a corporal’s guard unit. Dahlgren delegated Commander Thomas H. Stevens of the monitor Patapsco to lead a force of 400 sailors and marines in 25 boats to overcome the few remaining Rebel troops and take possession of the fort. Somewhat reluctantly, Stevens proceeded with the attack but less than half of the 25 boats managed to land and those that did landed on the right flank of the fort where they could not scale the fort’s walls rather than on the gorge where a passable breech existed. When the defenders realized the attack was underway the garrison fired a signal rocket and their compatriots at Fort Johnson opened fire on the invading Union boats while the Confederate gunboat Chicora opened fire upon the boats and landing party. The remains of the landing party took refuge in the shell holes blasted into the side of the fort’s defenses while the sailors and marines in the retreating boats fired blindly at the fort endangering the exposed landing party more than the Confederate troops inside. Eight Union soldiers were killed, 19 were wounded and 105 were captured while the Confederates suffered no casualties at all.

The Union Army flotilla, under General Gillmore’s command was staged between Morris Island and James Island where Gilmore’s engineers had constructed a battery in the marshlands. An exceptionally low tide delayed their scheduled departure to join forces with Admiral Dahlgren’s naval assault force and by the time the tide reversed sufficiently to free their movement the Confederate’s had already defeated and captured most of Dahlgren’s surviving force and it became clearly evident that any further attempt to assault the fort would be pointless. General Gillmore’s Marsh Battery contained an 8-inch mounted Parrott Rifle which was considered the cutting edge of modern artillery at the time. The thing weighed 16,500 pounds and used a 16 pound charge to fire a 200 pound projectile over a maximum range of 8,000 yards at it’s highest elevation. Gillmore’s troops nicknamed the gun the “Swamp Angel.” Without regard for the innocent non-combatants including many women and children, on August 21, 1863, Gillmore ordered his gunners to commence firing incendiary and explosive shells into the city of Charleston causing many fires and great destruction. On the 32nd volley, much to the relief of Charleston’s citizens the massive cannon burst apart.

Following the failed assault, the bombardment of Fort Sumter recommenced and proceeded with varying degrees of ferocity until the war ended. Despite their many casualties, the stalwart Confederates continued to salvage guns and ammunition from the ruins and their highly capable sharpshooters harassed the Union batteries with deadly accuracy. The Confederacy never surrendered Fort Sumter. The granite stone blasted from the top two tiers was moved outside and stacked up against the remaining walls along with sand bags and palmetto logs while rendering the fort even stronger and more defensible. The Confederate infantry successfully continued their defense and full control of Fort Sumter until the Union General William T. Sherman’s advance through South Carolina forced the evacuation of Charleston on February 17, 1865. On April 14, 1865, the retired Major Robert Anderson returned to the fort and raised the same Union flag that he was forced to lower when he surrendered the fort to the Confederacy exactly four years earlier.

________________________________________________________

Shortly after our visit to Charleston we flew down to New Orleans where we discovered a climate so hot and humid that condensation was dripping off the fogged up windows of the airport. We caught a shuttle to our hotel in the Garden District near St. Charles and Josephine Street, checked in, unpacked our luggage, cooled off in the shower and went out to explore the city. We walked down Josephine to Market Street, turned left and continued walking all the way to the shops along the riverfront near Canal Street. By that time we were both drenched in sweat, so I sat in the air conditioned mall while my wife shopped for some more appropriate clothes and shoes (of course). We took the trolley down Canal to St. Charles and caught another that dropped us off near our hotel where we immediately took another shower before going back out. Over the next few days we wandered around Bourbon Street, explored the much of the French Quarter, rode the trolley down to Congo Square, wandered through a endless graveyard the size of a small city and spent more than a few evenings futilely trying to squeeze some winnings out of the slots at Harrah’s Casino at the end of Canal Street. As far as casinos are concerned I have seen few that are tighter. I estimate that the odds are you could win more money from a pay phone than you could at that casino’s best paying slot machine. It doesn’t matter if you’re playing pennies, nickels, quarters or dollars, you are guaranteed to come out with less than you start with because they’ve got those machines screwed down so tight that the reels barely spin. It might be that I’ve been spoiled by playing the slots in California, Nevada, New Mexico and a half dozen other states where it is actually possible to win once in awhile, but as far as I’m concerned, that big glitzy casino at the end of Canal Street in New Orleans exists only to fleece the tourist trade and the next time I visit New Orleans I won’t waste any time in that establishment.

________________________________________________________

The most interesting time we spent in the Big Easy was the afternoon we spent at the Confederate Memorial Hall Museum located down Howard Street from the traffic circle where the memorial to Robert E. Lee was built. The Confederate Memorial Hall Museum is a beautiful old ornate brick and stone building with a great deal of fine architectural detail. The interior is a massive continuous open hall with an open timber framed ceiling with several heavy solid trusses running across the width of the structure. The careful craftsmanship expended on the framing of the ceiling alone is staggering and the entire building is one of New Orleans most beautiful examples of fine Southern architecture imaginable. The collection of artifacts displayed within the museum includes the personal effects of many of the Confederacies most notable leaders such as General Beauregard, General Polk, Brigadier General Gibson, Colonel Mouton and General Hood. The museum also contains the symbolic crown of thorns sent to Jefferson Davis by Pope Pius IX during his two years of solitary confinement at Fort Monroe following the end of the war. There is a great deal of Confederate history carefully preserved within those walls and some of the finest examples of exquisite sabers, rifles, pistols and an ample collection of portrait paintings, ambrotypes, tintypes and daguerreotypes of individual soldiers, Officers, and civilians of the Confederacy. There is also a large display of personal effects and old photographs of the numerous African Confederates who voluntarily served the Confederate cause; a historical detail often omitted from historical discussions of the Civil War.

While in the Confederate Memorial Hall Museum I had brief chat with the one of the curators regarding the legality and justification for the secession of the Confederate states. The commonly held belief is that the Civil War was fought to free the slaves, at least that is what most of us have been told in our American history classes, and it is actually a myth. When South Carolina seceded from the union in 1860 and Abraham Lincoln called for 75,000 Union troops to go down there and screw their feet to the floor he had no intention of abolishing slavery. The fact of the matter is, Lincoln expressed the belief that the institution of slavery was provided for under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution and even though he did not believe that slavery was morally correct he would do nothing to abolish it because he took an oath of office that required him to uphold the provisions of the U.S. Constitution. Ultimately, abolishing the institution of slavery in the Confederate states had nothing to do with equality for the black slaves. The abolition of slavery was implemented as a method of punishing the Confederate states for their secession from the Union and the primary driving force behind it was the political desire of the new Republican Party to destroy the economy and rapidly dwindling political influence of the southern states.

Prior to the Civil War the Southern States were dominated by large labor intensive agricultural plantations. The institution of slavery was firmly established in the American colonies at the time of the American Revolution. It was most important in the five southern states from Maryland to Georgia, but the total of a half million slaves were spread out through all of the colonies. In the South 40% of the population was made up of slaves, and as Americans moved into Kentucky and the rest of the southwest fully one-sixth of the settlers were slaves. During the Constitutional Convention of 1787 the one issue where compromise was found to be impossible was the issue of slavery’s abolition. The Christian concept of morality could not overcome the pragmatism of a society that was then heavily dependent on the agricultural industry’s need for laborers and the influence of Southern representatives made the national abolition of slavery very unlikely in the foreseeable future, the dominance of the Southern state’s influence was made evident by the 3/5ths compromise reached during the 1787 Convention which allowed three-fifths of the population of slaves to be counted for enumeration purposes regarding both the distribution of taxes and the apportionment of the members of the United States House of Representatives. Nonetheless, a small antislavery movement, led by the Quakers, had some impact in the 1780s, and by the end of that decade all of the states except for Georgia had placed some restrictions on the importation of additional slaves. When the slave trade was outlawed in 1808 most Americans felt that the issue of slavery had been resolved. The small group of Southern states continued to hold a great deal of influence over national politics because of the 3/5ths compromise and it was a never ending source of frustration for the Northern states where their economy began to rapidly grow as a result of industrialization, mining, commerce and transportation coupled with a growing urban population fueled by a high birth rate and large numbers of Irish, British, and German immigrants. The Southern states had little immigration, few towns and cities and beyond the large plantations, most of their non-agricultural industry was limited to small manufacturing enterprises in a few border areas. As the economy and population of the North continued to swell it became increasingly difficult for the South to continue to influence the national government and many Southerners were worried about the relative political decline of their region. In the attempt to maintain unity, most politicians continued to moderate their opposition to slavery in the South, but the sectional ideologies in national politics became increasingly virulent and hostile. The old second party system collapsed in the 1850′s and the Republican Party began to gain popularity in the Northern states where most of the industrialization was taking place as well as in the agrarian Midwest as the northern states became more committed to the economic concept of free-labor industrial capitalism. For the South, the issue of slavery was wrapped tightly around the constitutional concept of property rights and the abolition of slavery was considered a death sentence for the Southern economy.

The states that seceded from the Union and formed the Confederacy considered the issue of slavery as being merely a part of their justification for secession. The American Revolution against the British Empire resulted in the Colonies Declaration made on the 4th of July, 1776, “”that they are, and of right ought to be, FREE AND INDEPENDENT STATES; and that, as free and independent States, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent States may of right do.” The federal government of the United States had strayed far afield from the original vision expressed by the founding fathers of the nation and many in the Southern states viewed the overbearing acts of legislation enacted by the U.S. Congress as blatant violations of the U.S. Constitution because those laws encroached heavily upon the reserved rights of the States. Inasmuch as the Declaration of Independence clearly established that whenever any “form of government becomes destructive of the ends for which it was established, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute a new government.” Following the Declaration of Independence each of the thirteen original states exercised its separate sovereignty, and one by one each adopted its own Constitution, appointed officers for the administration of its own government in all three departments, Legislative, Executive and Judicial, and each formed its own militia for the common defense of its citizens. In 1778 the thirteen states entered into a League under the provisions of the Articles of Confederation and thereby allowing a common agent to administer each state’s external relations. That common agent was the United States Congress, however, the second Article in that agreement declared in simple, clear terms, “Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right, which is not by this Confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled.” Following the logic derived from the historical documents substantially and credibly recording in very clear language the details and intention of all agreements, declarations and laws established, the states that seceded from the Union, beginning in 1860 with South Carolina, were legally justified in their actions by reason of two primary, and well established principles, namely, the right of a State to govern itself; and the right of a people to abolish a Government when it becomes destructive of the ends for which it was instituted.

________________________________________________________

While the discussion above may seem like another historical diversion, it is in fact, very relevant to the essential nature of this blog and the author’s personal viewpoint that the United States of America has lost its moral compass, the nation’s current economic path is unsustainable, the government has become far to tyrannical and that the division that once existed between the two primary political parties, the division that provided our government with a true sense of balance has eroded to the point that both parties are pretty much the same, no real balance exists, representation of the American people has ceased to exist and corrupt professional politicians dominate a political environment in a government that has become far too large, convoluted and lumbering to benefit the citizens it is supposed to be serving.

The healthy secession movement that is growing in the state of Alaska is fueled primarily by the tremendous amount of highly questionable legislative acts passing through the United States Congress to eventually become laws that are then supported by a Supreme Court, whose members are more than willing to redefine the terms of our constitution according to the whims of self-serving politicians.

On April 15, 2009, the Governor of the state of Texas stood on the steps of the State House in Austin and publicly threatened to pull Texas from the Union and form an independent, sovereign republic because a rapidly growing number of that state’s citizens are entirely fed up with the blatant corruption evident in the federal government.

In Vermont a retired economics professor leads a growing secessionist movement called the Second Vermont Republic made up of a rapidly growing network of citizens who are dedicated to separating their state from what they view as the “the American Empire.”

In the northwest, the citizens of Oregon, Washington and the Canadian province of British Columbia are banding together in a separatist movement to form the independent Republic of Cascadia.

Secessionist movements have sprung up in New Hampshire and Hawaii as well, and one recent poll has indicated that more than 20% of the nation’s population has expressed their support for succession. While many American citizens and most elected officials in Washington D.C. have dismissed the sentiments of these secessionist groups, all available evidence indicates that an increasing number of American citizens, including a large number of U.S. Military officials, are dismayed by the ever accelerating erosion freedom, liberty and formerly considered “inalienable” rights once guaranteed under the provisions of the U.S. Bill of Rights. There is good reason for their dismay. Virtually every inalienable right expressed by our founding fathers has been abrogated by Congressional action or subjected to multiple re-definitions by the radical activists appointed to the Supreme Court for their eager willingness to legislate from the judicial bench infringements that cannot be accomplished by political means.

History indicates that the secession of individual states may not be the most intelligent course of action. In the current case the states that are most actively leaning in this direction are scattered across the entire nation. New Hampshire and Vermont are relatively small states with small populations that are primarily oriented toward political liberalism. Hawaii, while isolated by distance, is fairly similar in nature. It’s population is small and the citizens lean predominantly to the left of center, however, the state of Hawaii is about as far from New Hampshire and Vermont as it could possibly get and the possibility of these three states achieving any sort of an effective alliance ranges the spectrum of possibility from slim to non-existent. It is fairly easy to dismiss the ranting of liberals as frustrated political rhetoric. As far as the visionary independent Republic of Cascadia is concerned, that is a movement that has been underway for years and it appears to have about as much credibility as the Flat-Earth Society. Secession would be drastic step for any state government to take and it is difficult to imagine any state where the citizens are sufficiently united against the current administration to pull off a successful effort in this regard. However, it is only a matter of time before the current crop of politicians in Washington D.C. step over the line from acceptability to outrage. Their own arrogance will ultimately drive them to make one completely egregious error of judgment that will tip the scales of freedom and liberty over on its side and the people of this nation will finally see the line in the sand and either take matters into their own hands of accept the bonds of lifelong servitude to a government that exists for it own benefit and serves the interests of the elite.

________________________________________________________

All things considered, including the temperature and precipitation, we had a great time everywhere we went. The Eastern seaboard of this nation is dripping in great history from one end to the other and there is a lot of American history that is conveniently left out of this nation’s textbooks that should be known. As a native Californian, I envy the New Yorker’s subway system. As rickety as some of those trains are they provide the best rapid transit system I have ever experienced and it certainly beats the heck out of the parking lot we call the 405 freeway. The oddest thing I noticed about New York is that, despite the fact that in many areas the trash is picked up three times a week, they don’t recycle anything and New York produces trash like no place on Earth. They could probably create a billion dollar a day recycling industry in that city with all of the cardboard and glass bottles that are stacked up on the streets every single day. It amazes me that nobody has figured this out. As far as New Orleans is concerned, they are still struggling to recover from the damage of hurricane Katrina. Construction is going on everywhere and the evidence of ruin is apparent in the many boarded up buildings and demolished houses that have yet to be torn down and hauled off. Among the citizenry there appears to be some degree of displeasure for FEMA and you can buy T-shirts in local shops that bear the FEMA logo and the message underneath it saying “Find Every Mexican Available.” Obviously, FEMA hasn’t exactly gone out of their way to hire the local contractors and the people down there seem to be under the belief that much of the towns reconstruction is being given to contractors from out of state using low-paid illegal alien workers. I don’t know if this is true but it seems to be the general sentiment among the local populace. At any rate we had a great trip, and we were glad when our last flight touched down at LAX.

Technorati Tags

, , , ,, ,

digg this | del.icio.us

JUDAS GOT HIS THIRTY PIECES OF SILVER SO WHY SHOULDN’T OBAMA GET THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE?

Posted in An American Revolution on October 12th, 2009 by MorningStar

Even the blabbering American News Media doesn’t seem to be able to get a decent handle on why Barack Obama was given the Nobel Peace Prize. Some have speculated that the award was meant to inspire him to loftier accomplishments and others have suggested that it was awarded to him for the hopeful purpose of reversing his rapidly dwindling support among the American people. Neither version carries much credibility and some of Obama’s most stalwart supporters in the American news media have come dangerously close to admitting that Obama has accomplished nothing of any true merit since he entered office and that most of his campaign promises have fallen by the wayside, progress on his self-proclaimed more important agenda items have slowed to a crawl or stopped completely, and most of what he has done has made the nation’s problems worse than they were before he entered office. He has increased the $1.3 trillion dollar national debt he inherited from George W. Bush to a whopping $12 trillion dollars and initiated plans that could double that figure before the end of his second year in office.

As the Commander in Chief he has lost what little trust he ever had with most of the United States Military officers, enlisted personnel and Pentagon officials and has ordered military commanders in charge of troops stationed in extremely hostile combat zones to implement “rules of engagement” that prohibit their ability to defend themselves even when our brave young troops are under direct attack by enemy forces and American soldiers are being killed. He has directed entire American defense systems be dismantled and carted off to the scrap pile and refused to allocate funds for building the advanced replacement defense systems that the American government has already spent billions of American tax dollars designing and engineering, and our nation has never been more defenseless or vulnerable to attack than it is today.

As the chief administrator of the nation, Obama has intentionally taken steps to ensure that the American tax payers will be indebted to the foreign financers he has borrowed trillions of dollars from for a minimum of fifty years into the future. Asian and European financers now own more of our nation than the combined population of American citizens and the entire U.S. Government and the American economy has become entirely dependent on the questionable good will of foreign interests who can call our debts to them due at any time. We no longer have to worry about being invaded by foreign military because thanks to Obama, they already own most of the country and they can legally claim their property at any time. The money handed out to American banks, finance companies and insurance companies came from foreign interests who now underwrite their activities and the mortgage on your home might have the name of an American finance company across the top but the ultimate owner of that debt is more than likely the Chinese government who financed Obama’s economic stimulus disaster.

The Democratic National Party has taken to calling anybody who dares to criticize Barack Obama’s Marxist agenda right wing extremists and racists, and of the Republican elected representatives who publicly condemned his selection as the recipient of the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize, the DNC spokesman, Brad Woodhouse, outrageously claimed “the Republican Party has thrown in its lot with the terrorists, the Taliban and Hamas this morning, in criticizing the President for receiving the Nobel Peace Prize.” Obviously the DNC can’t come up with one good reason why Obama would be given that prize so they’ve resorted to demonizing the critics by claiming that they are allied with terrorists. While the statement may have been a simple knee-jerk reaction shooting out of Woodhouse’s mouth before his brain kicked into gear, the fact of the matter is that it’s downright stupid, and unfortunately, stupid statements of this nature are increasingly becoming more characteristic of liberal politicians who lack real answers to honest questions. I don’t know any truly logical and intelligent registered Democrats, but if there is such a thing, I doubt that they would find Woodhouse’s statement very satisfying.

Please, bear in mind that I am not blindly rushing to the support of the Republican Party in this matter even though I believe their criticism is justified. The Republican Party, generally speaking, have proven that they are no more interested in serving the best interests of the American people than the Democrats have of late. The Democrats and the Republicans have both demonstrated a global agenda and both have demonstrated a strong propensity to increase the size and scope of government control and the ultimate goal of both political parties is less freedom and liberty for the American people and more tyrannical authority for government.

The actions of both primary political parties aptly demonstrate the simple truth that neither is as interested in providing the American citizens with life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness as they are in consolidating their particular group’s power to control the destiny of a system of government that has evolved from “by the people and for the people” into a monstrous perversity that serves the highest bidder while the American people suffer the consequences of clever political manipulators who create one crisis after another and then offer solutions that further erode our few remaining constitutional rights, increases the size and authority of government, decreases the prosperity of the American people and strengthens the bonds of government servitude that have been forced upon us.

SOME BACKGROUND ON THE NOBEL PRIZES
The Nobel Peace Prize is one of the five Nobel Prizes handed out yearly by a foundation initiated and funded through the will and estate of the Swedish industrialist and inventor Alfred Nobel. Alfred Nobel’s most significant invention was dynamite. His fortune was earned as the result of his ownership of the Swedish manufacturing company that opened for business in 1875. That company was then known as Bofors, it is now split into two divisions. BAE Systems Bofors was acquired by the United States based company United Defense Industries and continues to supply the world government’s with heavy weapons such as the massive ship mounted artillery pieces seen on American destroyers. The company’s 40 mm anti-aircraft gun was based on a proprietary Bofors design and was produced and sold by the Swedish company to both sides throughout World War II. The second division of Bofors, formerly known as the Celsius Group, was purchased by Saab in 1999 and has since become known as Saab Bofors Dynamics. Saab Bofors Dynamics develops, manufactures and sells missile systems and anti-tank systems such as the RBS 70 SAM system, the portable shoulder fired disposable NLAW light anti-armor weapon as well as some of the more sophisticated missile systems all of which are sold to anyone with the money to purchase them and the willingness to use them against enemies real or imagined.

It is not uncommon for any of these five these prizes to be split between more than one winner and they are sometimes given to organizations as opposed to individuals. Four of the five Nobel prizes are awarded at the annual Prize Award Ceremony held in Stockholm, Sweden. The recipients for the prizes related to physiology or medicine, literature, economics, physics and chemistry are selected by committees established under the auspices of the Nobel Foundation. According to Alfred Nobel’s directive written into his last will and testament “the prizes for physics and chemistry shall be awarded by the Swedish Academy of Sciences; that for physiological or medical works by Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm; that for literature by the Academy in Stockholm.”

The Nobel Peace Prize is unique among the five prizes awarded because Alfred Nobel stipulated in his will that the recipient or recipients be selected by a Norwegian committee appointed by the Norwegian Parliament and the prize is awarded to the recipient during a ceremony held at the Oslo City Hall. Nominations are received by numerous groups including University professors of history, political science, philosophy, law and theology, members of the Permanent Court of Arbitration and the International Court of Justice at the Hague, former advisers to the Norwegian Nobel Institute, former recipients of the prize (such as Jimmy Carter), and a host of other groups and individuals. There were 205 nominations received by the Norwegian committee for the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize.

The list of nominees is kept secret for fifty years following the award of the prize and a database of nominees for the years from 1901 to 1955 is available and there are some surprising names found in that list including Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, and Benito Mussolini. However surprising the list of former nominees might be it is nothing compared to the list of recipients.

1905
Theodore Roosevelt, the 26th President of the United States who allied the US with the Philippine people during their war of independence from Spanish rule, and then turned around and accepted control of the Philippines from the Spanish as reparations for the war. The outraged Philippine people who fought for independence from Spain soon saw their new Republic become a territory of the United States and their former U.S. allies used military force to suppress their anger.

1945
Cordell Hull, the former Secretary of State under Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s administration vehemently opposed granting political asylum to more than 950 Jewish refugees who escaped from Nazi persecution in Germany on the ship St. Louis sailing from Hamburg in the summer of 1939 just prior to World War II. The ship waited for months in the Caribbean Sea between Florida and Cuba while the debate raged on in the U.S. and after negotiations between the passengers and the Cuban government broke down the ship’s captain was forced to return to Europe and more than 25% of the passengers were slaughtered by the Nazis during the Holocaust.

1973
Henry A. Kissinger, former United States Secretary of State who instituted the secret bombing campaign in Cambodia that went on from 1960 through 1975; was heavily involved in Operation Condor, a mid-1970s campaign of kidnapping and murder coordinated among the intelligence and security services of Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Paraguay, and Uruguay. Originally the 1973 Nobel Peace Prize was to split between Kissinger and Lê Ðuc Tho, the Vietnamese Communist leader of the Viet-Cong who brutally terrorized and slaughtered the peaceful South Vietnamese villagers while waging war against their Democratic government, the French, and later the American Military who attempted to assist them, however, Lê Ðuc Tho spurned the Nobel Peace prize as a meaningless gesture; an opinion not shared by Kissinger who eagerly accepted it.

1978
Anwar Sadat, president of Egypt who initiated the brutal, but ill-fated Yom Kippur War against Israel in

1994
Yasser Arafat, the leader of the terrorist organization known as the Palestine Liberation Order (PLO) who popularized the Middle Eastern custom of manipulating unstable teenage religious fanatics and individuals with Down’s syndrome to become suicide bombers against Israel. Under the direct influence of Arafat, the leaders of the PLO would recruit and equip these suicide bombers with explosive vests packed with C4 and ball bearings which they would then detonate in crowded nightclubs, elementary schools and on public buses throughout Israel primarily targeting innocent civilians and children.

2002
Jimmy Carter, the 39th President of the United States whose refusal to assist the pro-U.S. Shah of Iran’s request for help in putting down a growing revolutionary movement in Iran resulted in the overthrow of the government and allowed the Ayatollah Khomeini to return and establish a distinctly anti-U.S. Islamic theocracy that has since kept the entire Middle East in a constant state of turmoil. The final year of Carter’s presidency was characterized by the 1979 takeover of the American embassy in Iran and Iran Hostage Crisis that lasted for 444 days from November 4, 1979 to January 20, 1981. The 54 hostages were released within minutes of Ronald Reagan’s inauguration as the 40th President of the United States. The theocratic nation of Iran has maintained it’s vehement level of hatred for the United States since it’s inception and has been the main supplier of arms, ammunition and military training to Islamic terrorists throughout the Middle East. The fanatical Iranian Islamic government poses a serious threat to the security of the entire Western world as they race against time to develop a nuclear arsenal and there is little doubt among the current world leaders of merit that the Iranian government will use their nuclear weapons to consolidate their power over the entire Middle East and ultimately to attack Western nations and primarily the United States. This threat is the lasting legacy of Jimmy Carter, the winner of the 2002 Nobel Peace Prize.

2004
Wangari Muta Maathai, a Kenyan environmental and political activist whose primary claim to fame seems to be that she started the rumor that the HIV/AIDS virus was “deliberately created by Western scientists to decimate the African population.”

2007
Al Gore, the 45th Vice President of the United States who served under President Bill Clinton and later became an overly outspoken environmental activist of dubious merit. Gore shared his prize with the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The justification for this award to either party is somewhat vague and nobody really seems to understand why they were given the Nobel Peace Prize for their support of a pseudo-scientific theory that has never been conclusively proven to be accurate.

2009
Barack Obama – The official statement of the Nobel web site states that Obama was awarded the 2009 Peace prize “for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.”

____________________________________________________________

However “extraordinary” as Obama’s efforts might seem to some, he has accomplished nothing that can be even remotely viewed as beneficial to anyone, any group, or any nation on this planet. Under Barack Obama’s leadership the Democratic National Party has rededicated their considerable political power to becoming the only political party in the United States, and more often than not, the Republican Party appears to be assisting them in this effort by consistently moving further away from the conservative values shared by most American citizens who simply want to live peaceful lives, attain some level of financial comfort, raise their families according to their long-held beliefs and enjoy themselves without intrusive government intervention into their private lives and burdensome taxes that sap their savings to pay for entitlement programs for those too lazy to work for a living. Contrary to what the official statement might say, Barack Obama has not strengthened the cooperation between the American people he was elected to serve, he has intentionally taken advantage of it and purposely widened the gap between the working American citizens, and those who feel that that the government exists only to give them free financial support, free educations, free housing, free medical care, and free food. The promises he has made to provide these people with all of these things is only possible through the implementation of a Marxist system of government where those who are willing to work are made to pay the way for those who are not willing to work. It is a system of government that has been tried many times in many different countries, and in every case it has failed miserably. For 233 years the dream of attainable prosperity has motivated American citizens to work hard and save their money, invest wisely and ultimately achieve the highest level of comfort possible according to the capabilities and effort of the individual. Obama’s dream is to see the attainment of financial prosperity evaporate; take the hard earned money of the working class and distribute it to those who are unwilling to work and save and thereby achieve financial equality for everyone. The most evident problem with this line of thought is that if prosperity becomes impossible to attain, people will not be motivated to work and must be forced by threats of legal action and possible violence. When Barack Obama promised “Change” none of his supporters questioned the nature of these changes. Maybe they should have.

Most Americans have lived their entire lives not bothering to pay much attention to their government. Many of them have always figured it would be there when they needed it, and those who talked incessantly about political situations were avoided, considered right-wing wackos, conspiracy freaks, gun nuts and flat-taxers, pro-lifers and Bible thumping Pentecostal racists. This is the same crowd that figured they could sleep through the election and life would go on the same as it always has; nothing would change. While they were sleeping, millions of gum-smacking teenagers, illegal aliens, welfare recipients, union represented airheads and glassy eyed Kool-Aid drinking liberals went to the polls and voted for a certifiable nut-job hell bent on destroying our nation and our entire way of life. Even now, as some of you read these words many are still operating under the delusional belief that nothing is going to change, life will go on as it always has and nothing will happen. Anyone that truly believes that is in for one really rude awakening and it is coming at them a lot faster than they realize, and the fact of the matter is it’s already here. You are already a slave to a government that takes more than half of everything you earn and plans to take even more in the future. You, your children, your grandchildren and their grandchildren will spend their lives working to pay off the massive foreign debts that Obama has amassed just in the last ten months, to say nothing of what he will borrow in the future to implement future changes as he see fit.

All across this nation people just like those who slept through the election and quite a few that voted for the man who promised “Change” are starting to realize the serious error they have made. Formerly very quiet people are beginning to speak out against what they see going on in the government that once got it’s authority from them and now exercises it’s authority over them. People are getting angry at what they are witnessing and some are talking about the need for drastic measures. Obama may be completely out of touch with reality but those who have propped him up, pushed hard to get that nobody elected and want to see their agenda succeed are aware of what is being said and they are well aware that their plans can be swept away to nothing if the American people stand united. They are afraid of us. You can feel their fear on the streets of Washington D.C.; you can see it in their eyes and know they will do everything in their power to distract our attention with smoke and mirrors, bread and circuses, anything to keep us divided while they hurry to finish their work before the American people wake up to the fact that they’ve been sucker punched.

When the American people wake up there will be no Democrats and there will be no Republicans. African-Americans, Mexican-Americans, Native-Americans, Asian-Americans and every other variation of hyphenated American will disappear overnight and the elitist politicians who make up the rules that they demand we follow will stand face to face with unified Americans. A group without color; a group that shared the one common heritage of freedom and liberty, and a group with one common goal, the restoration of a once great nation and the eradication of all who stand in their way. You can leave your slingshot at home because the brave sons and daughters who now serve in the American military are as sick and tired of the politician’s crap as we are and they will be standing there with everyone else, shoulder to shoulder when that great day comes, and the tree of liberty will quench its thirst with the blood of tyrants.

On second thought, if Obama proves to be the proverbial final straw that breaks the camels back, stirs up the sleeping tiger and sets off a new American Revolution that ultimately restores American freedom, liberty and prosperity thereby making the entire world a much safer and better place to live, maybe he does deserve a shiny medal for the destruction he’s caused. Maybe he can use it to buy himself a comfy corner in the ninth circle. After all, the laborer is worthy of his hire, and even Judas got his 30 pieces of silver.

Technorati Tags

digg this | del.icio.us

I’m Back From Vacation

Posted in In General on October 11th, 2009 by MorningStar

In case anyone has been wondering, I’ve been on vacation. I will get into more details later but for now I will just say that in the last two weeks I’ve been to New York, Washington D.C., South Carolina, and New Orleans. We flew home yesterday with a brief stop in Texas and arrived home late last night. Once I get my head back to normal, allow my feet to recover from all of the walking and get everything unpacked I will get into some more detail about the trip. I took a few thousand photos while I was gone and decided to share the most memorable one in this posting. It’s a demonstration of highly opinionionated free speech. Until them you’ll just have to be patient.

Obamas Lawn

Technorati Tags

digg this | del.icio.us

Gone Fishing

Posted in In General on October 7th, 2009 by MorningStar

In case you all havent figured it out, I am vacationing temporarily and will return soon.